IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 143 MANJEET KAUR AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents at the hands of respondent representation dated 16.05.202 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner 16.05.2025 before the raising their grievances not yet been considered and no action has submitted that at this stage, the directions are issued to Fazilka to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: MANJEET KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 13 representation dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure P-4). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Senior Superintendent of Police, grievances as mentioned in the present not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Senior decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.5482 of 2025 Date of decision: 26.05.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate for , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to take action on their 4). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Fazilka (Annexure P-4) in the present petition but the same has been taken thereon. He further would be satisfied if appropriate Senior Superintendent of Police, decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take of the the s their has recently filed a representation on 4) petition but the same has further satisfied if appropriate of Police, and take Jyoti 2025.05.26 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on be needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to her 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anyth of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 26.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.5482 of 2025 Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.5482 of 2025 -2- Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, who is present in Court, has half of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without ing on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-4) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in Court, has the paperbook be , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.05.26 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document