IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87209 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar @ Rajesh Prasad Son of Pramanand Prasad Resident of - Ward No. 5, Koyari Tola, Warisaliganj, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 4 12-05-2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025 dated 27.03.2025 registered under Section 126(2), 329(4), 115(2), 74, 75, 76, 352, 351(2), 308(2), 308(3) of the B.N.S. 2023. 3. As per the F.I.R. on 19.03.2025 at about 06:00 pm the petitioner entered into the house of the informant, started molesting her, pushed her on the ground and pulled her sari and thrown her son on the ground who came for her rescue. It is further alleged that during bath the petitioner managed to take obscene photograph of the informant and threatened her to make it viral and for deleting the same he demanded rupees two lakh and due to fear the informant transferred Rs. 50,000/- through phonepe. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87209 of 2025(4) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offenc in the manner alleged. The petitioner is himself a victim and the informant is a lady of easy virtue who has not set the law in motion with clean hands and has suppressed the real facts. The petitioner fell in the trap of the informant and thereafter the informant started blackmailing her and started demanding money and out of fear the petitioner used to pay money through online payment. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. Regard being had to the submission made by the petitioner, taking into consideration the nature of material collected during course of investigation particularly in paragraph nos. 24, 27 and 28 of the case diary and seizure of obscene video, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected. praful/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T