SHAFIQA AND ANR. v. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) AND ORS.
WP(C)/261/2024 · 2025-03-12
Javed Iqbal Wani
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6203 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6203 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 85 Reg.. list
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 261/2024 CM(4635/2024) CM(572/2024)
SHAFIQA AND ANR. …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. I. Sofi, Advocate Vs. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy AG Mr. T.A Lone, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
O R D E R 12.03.2025
1. Upon coming up of this matter for consideration, the appearing counsel for the petitioners would submit that the contesting parties have entered into a compromise outside the Court and resolved the disputes involved in the petition amicably, which resolution of disputes came to be reported
to this Court previously as well, as a consequence whereof, the statements of the parties were ordered to be recorded by this Court by the Registrar Judicial in terms of order dated 13.11.2024. 2. The statement of the contesting parties so recorded by the Registrar Judicial of this Court in compliance to the aforesaid order passed by this Court are extracted and reproduced here under:-
Statement of petitioner No. 1 namely Mst. Shafiqa D/o Abdul Samad Bagwan R/o Handwara District Kupwara, That in the wake of having amicably resolved and settled the dispute with the respondent No. 6 namely Surrender Kumar Pandita, I along with my husband (petitioner No. 2) have entered into a compromise with him which stands reduced in writing and executed on 04.07.2024. That the property which is the subject matter of the instant writ petition has now been purchased by me from its owners against an amount of Rs. 30.00 lacs. That the controversy between me and respondent No. 6 stands settled outside the Court in terms of the aforesaid compromise and therefore, I seek disposal of the instant petition in terms of the said compromise and the enclosed documents, besides the property in question be released in my favour. Statement of respondent No. 6 namely Surrender Kumar Pandita S/o Poshkar Nath Pandita R/o Handwara near Shiv Mandir at Present Migrant at Jammu. That the property which is the subject matter of the instant petition has now been purchased by petitioner No.1 from its owners which include me also, against an amount of Rs. 30.00 lacs. That in the wake of having amicably resolved and settled the dispute with the petitioner Nos.
1 & 2, I have entered into a compromise with them which stands reduced in writing and executed on 04.07.2024. That I now have no grievance against the petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 qua the property in question and I seek disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of the aforesaid compromise and the property in question be released in favour of the petitioner No.1,
3. Having regard to the aforesaid position obtaining in the matter, in particular the statements made by the petitioner 1 and respondent 6 herein, nothing survives for adjudication in the instant petition which accordingly shall stand disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived between the parties, and the orders impugned in the instant petition in view of above shall be deemed to have been quashed. (JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 12.03.2025
“S.Nuzhat”