Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62029 (ALL)

PANNA LAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WPIL/1544/2025 · 2025-09-14

J J Munir

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1544 of 2025 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J. 1. A personal affidavit has been filed by the Collector, Jaunpur. Let it be taken on record and numbered by the office. He has said that the chak marg has been restored and fully laid out with earth. Photographs of the chak marg have been annexed at page nos. 8 and 9 of the Collector's personal affidavit dated 11.09.2025. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner also acknowledges the fact that the chak marg has been cleared of all encroachment and restored. 3. In the circumstances, we direct the Tehsildar, Tehsil- Shahganj, District- Jaunpur and the Gram Pradhan, Village- Lavayan Bhagmalpur, Lavayan Jaunpur, District- Jaunpur to ensure that the chak marg, that has been restored, is not encroached by the owner of any adjoining field or any one else in any manner whatsoever. 4. This petition is allowed in terms of the aforesaid orders. 5. Let this order be communicated to the Tehsildar, Tehsil- Shahganj, District- Jaunpur and the Gram Pradhan, Village- Lavayan Bhagmalpur, Lavayan Jaunpur, District- Jaunpur through the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur by the Registrar (Compliance) within 48 hours. September 15, 2025 Prashant D. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Brij Napit Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C., Girijesh Kumar Tripathi, Kailash Pati Singh Yadav, Ram Kesh, Ramesh Pundir, Rekha Pundir (J.J. Munir,J.) Panna Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRASHANT DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad