Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62021 (ALL)

RAJENDRA PRASAD GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

NA529/1626/2025 · 2025-06-30

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:102591 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1626 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajendra Prasad Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No.292 of 2021 (Old No.1201 of 2020) (Rajendra Prasad Gupta Vs. M/s. Babu Cement Store & another) under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Bareilly pending in the Additional Court, Negotiable Instruments Act, Bareilly, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before the Court is the complainant of this case, who urged for the expeditious disposal of the case. 4. It appears from the perusal of the order-sheets that a discharge application moved by the accused / opposite party no.2 is pending since 2023. The said discharge application is not disposed of so far by the learned trial court. The matter is pending since 2021. 5. In these circumstances, the court concerned is directed to decide the discharge application moved by the accused as per law within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and if the said discharge application is decided in favour of the applicant, the trial court is directed to make all endeavours to expedite the trial of the case and to conclude it expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. 6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 1.7.2025 / ss Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad