Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62014 (KAR)

SRI KHAJA M S/O LATE M MOOSASAB v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/103633/2024 · 2025-09-24

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13110 WP No. 103633 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103633 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. KHAJA M. S/O. LATE M. MOOSASAB AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, WORKING AS CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN MUNCIPAL COUNCIL, SANDUR, DIST. BALLARY-583101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL S.DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, OR AN ORDER OR A DIRECTION DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13/03/2023 AS PER ANNEXURE-P REQUESTED TO MODIFY THE POST ORDER DATED 18/3/2002, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13110 WP No. 103633 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AM List No.: 3 Sl No.: 62