Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61989 (KAR)

RUPA D/O. BHIMARADDI GONDI v. VEERANGOUDA S/O. BASAPPA BANAPPANAVAR

MFA/100896/2014 · 2025-10-30

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14703 MFA No. 100896 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100896 OF 2014 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SMT. RUPA D/O. BHIMARADDI GONDI , W/O. SHRIDHAR GYANPPANAVAR, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: TEACHER, R/O. BADAMI BANKER’S COLONY, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT …APPELLANT (BY SRI. AHAMED ALI J. RAHIMANSHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. VEERANGOUDA S/O. BASAPPA BANAPPANAVAR, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: OWNER OF VEHICLE NO.KA-29/312-313, R/O. HEBBALLI, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOTI. GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.11.03 12:22:03 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14703 MFA No. 100896 of 2014 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., RAMDEV GALLI, BELGAUM, POLICY NO.602505/31/07/630002807M VALIDITY 20-03-2008 TO 19-03-2009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. VEENA HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07-12-2013 IN M.V.C.NO.765/2008 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER MACT VIII, BADAMI AND CONSEQUENTIALLY AWARD THE COMPENSATION AS CLAIMED IN THE CLAIM PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14703 MFA No. 100896 of 2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) No representation on the appellant’s side on call. 2. On 14.10.2025, following order was passed: “No representation on appellant’s side on call. Ms.Umera representing Ms.Veena Hegde, learned counsel on record for respondent No.2 is present. The appeal is of the year 2014. To give fair opportunity to the appellant to pursue the matter, list on 30.10.2025.” 3. Though such an order was passed, the appellant did not choose to represent. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE RH CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63