Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:87392 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17636 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajveer Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bhavesh Singh Jadaun,Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun,Satyajeet Singh Jadaun Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. Heard Sri Bhavesh Singh Jadaun, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Santosh Nigam, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondent. 2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.321 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 109, 3(5), 103(1) B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Sandipanghat, District Kaushambi, during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on the basis of false allegation, applicant has been made accused alongwith four others including co-accused Chhotai, Roshan Lal Pasi, Kanna @ Shivkaran and Jamuna Prasad and all the above co-accused have been released on bail by different Co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 11.04.2025, 07.05.2025, 06.05.2025 and 07.05.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.7802 of 2025, 14428 of 2025, 14403 of 2025 and 14432 of 2025, respectively and on facts case of applicant is at par with them. 4. He further submits that applicant is having no criminal history and he is in jail in the present matter since 27.11.2024 i.e. for last almost six months. 5. Per contra, learned AGA however opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the arguments on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. I have heard both the parties and perused the record of the case. 7. Considering the argument advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and the fact that similarly placed four co-accused Chhotai, Roshan Lal Pasi, Kanna @ Shivkaran and Jamuna Prasad have been released on bail by different Co-ordinate Benches of this Court and applicant is having no criminal history and he is in jail in the present matter since 27.11.2024 i.e. for last almost six months, in my view applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Rajveer be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless her personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 10. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 11. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Zafar Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ZAFAR ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad