Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6195 (UTT)

DEEPAK KHANNA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/886/2021 · 2025-01-09

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:388 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.886 of 2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Harsh Taneja, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Bora, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous, due to subsequent development. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 09.01.2025 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c04853654 45e3a20dddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454 C5109CB987446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2025.01.10 12:59:47 +05'30'