Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6195 (KAR)

SHIVAPUTRAPPA S/O BASAPPA HIREHOLI v. SIDDAPPA S/O BASAPPA HIREHOLI

WP/113504/2015 · 2025-01-22

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1143 WP No. 113504 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 113504 OF 2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SHIVAPUTRAPPA S/O. BASAPPA HIREHOLI, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED GOVT. SERVANT & AGRICULTURE, R/O: IRANI COLONY, NEAR KARIYAMMA TEMPLE, GADAG, TQ: & DIST: GADAG. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.N. GULARADDI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SIDDAPPA S/O. BASAPPA HIREHOLI, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HULLUR, TQ: RON, DIST: GADAG. 2. SHEKARAPPA S/O. BASAPPA HIREHOLI, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: C/O: SIDDAYYA GANGOTRI, SIT BACK GATE, BEHIND KENADY GUEST HOUSE, "A" CROSS, TUMAKURU, TQ: & DIST: TUMAKURU. 3. SANGAVVA @ DRAKSHANNAVVA W/O. RAMANAGOUDA HULIGOLLA, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: C/O: YALLAPPAGOUDA S/O. RAMANAGOUDA HULIGOLLA, FIRE BRIGADE DEPARTMENT, SAMBAPUR ROAD, GADAG, TQ: & DIST: GADAG. …RESPONDENTS ( R1-SERVED; R3-HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28.09.2015, PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC RON IN MISC.NO.12/2015, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. GIRIJA A BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1143 WP No. 113504 of 2015 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and quash the Order dated 28.09.2015, passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ron in Misc.No.12/2015, produced at ANNEXURE-D. ii. Issue any other writ or direction or order that this Honorable court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. 2. Despite the order dated 06.01.2025, none appears for the petitioner today also. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE gab CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4