APHC010056762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 140/2025 Between: Tirumala Naga Venkata Satyanarayana, ...PETITIONER AND State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Mallavelli Naga Sai Lalith Kumar Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Public Prosecutor 2. Siram Jaswanth The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: I.A.No.4 of 2025 This application is filed seeking permission to compromise the case. 2. The petitioner and the 2nd respondent are present. 3. The respondent No.2 submits that he had received the amount in respect of the cheque issued by the petitioner. Both the petitioner and the 2nd 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.140 of 2025 Dated 01.08.2025 respondent intend to compromise the case by ways of filing joint memo and also affidavits to that effect. 4. For the reasons mentioned in the joint memo and affidavits, the petition is allowed permitting the petitioner to compromise the case. Accordingly, the I.A.No.4 of 2025 is allowed. I.A.No.3 of 2025 5. This application is filed to compound the offence. 6. I.A.No.4 of 2025 is allowed permitting the petitioner to compromise the case. 7. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit, the petition is allowed. The 2nd respondent is directed to compound the offence with the petitioner under Section 147 of ‘the N.I.Act.,’ read with 320 (6) of ‘the Cr.P.C’. Resultantly, the petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C’. 8. In view of the above reasons, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 is allowed, permitting the both parties to compromise the case. The 2nd respondent is permitted to compound the offence with the petitioner. 9. Accordingly, the I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed, and the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised by compounding the offence. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Special 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.140 of 2025 Dated 01.08.2025 Magistrate, Tanuku, in C.C.No.321 of 2021, dated 05.03.2024, as confirmed in Criminal Appeal No.51 of 2024, dated 06.12.2024, by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tanuku, are set aside, as a result, the petitioner is acquitted. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 01.08.2025 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.140 of 2025 Dated 01.08.2025 200 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 140 OF 2025 01.08.2025 W KMS