Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61920 (PNJ)

CHIRAG SHARMA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/28883/2025 · 2025-07-21

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

327 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHIRAG SHARMA STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Mr. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No. 24.09.2024, registered under Sections Police Station Civil Lines, proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure P 2. Mr. Vikas Malik Advocate, accepts notice on respondent No.2 admits to the factum of compromise. 3. The following order was passed on IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: CHIRAG SHARMA AND OTHERS V/S HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Shiv Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Satbir Gori Puriya DAG, Haryana **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No. , registered under Sections 406 and 420 Civil Lines, District Kaithal (Annexur proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated .05.2025 (Annexure P-2). Mr. Vikas Malik Advocate, accepts notice on No.2 and files his power of attorney, which is taken on record. admits to the factum of compromise. The following order was passed on “Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the No.43 dated 24.09.2024, registered under Indian Penal Code at Police Station (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising same, on the basis compromise dated 16 Notice of motion. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 Adjourned to 21.07.2025. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28883-2025 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR for the petitioners. Haryana. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No.403 dated 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code at Kaithal (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated Mr. Vikas Malik Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of and files his power of attorney, which is taken on record. He The following order was passed on 23.05.2025 :- petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR , registered under Sections 46 and 420 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Civil Lines, District Kaithal bsequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis compromise dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure P-2). DAG Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State. .07.2025. HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28883-2025 4. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 5. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SC Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and and 420 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station (Annexure P-1) quashed, qua the petitioner July 21, 2025 himanshu (i) (ii) 2025 2 In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of the compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed i.e. 21.07.2025. This shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to secure the presence of respondent No.2 before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate. A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and FIR No.403 dated 24.09.2024, registered under Sect Indian Penal Code at Police Station 1) and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioners. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks ther date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of romise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed This shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to secure the presence of respondent No.2 before the learned trial A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition , registered under Sections 406 Indian Penal Code at Police Station Civil Lines, District Kaithal proceedings arising out of the same are HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document