Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6192 (JHR)

DWARIKA SINGH v. GULSHAN ARA

C.M.P./166/2023 · 2025-05-05

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:13453 -1- C.M.P. No. 166 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 166 of 2023 1. Dwarika Singh, aged about 68 years 2. Shyam Singh @ Shyam Sunder Singh, aged about 78 years 3. Chhotelal Singh, aged about 73 years All are sons of Late Khusro Singh, All are residents of Village Telodih, P.O. Handadih, P.s. Giridih (M), District- Giridih … Petitioners -Versus- 1. Gulshan Ara, widow of Late Shaukat Ansari, resident of Mouza- Bhandaridih, P.O. Giridih, P.S. Giridih (Town), District- Giridih 2. Mohammad Aslam, son of Mohammad Islam, resident of Bhandaridih, P.O. Giridih, P.S. Giridih (Town), District- Giridih 3. Raj Kumar Singh 4. Nirmal Kumar Singh 5. Mahendra Singh 6. Manoj Singh All are sons of Late Ram Prasad Singh 7. Sumitra Devi 8. Anjana Devi 9. Amita Devi All are daughters of Late Ram Prasad Singh 10. Dropadi Devi 11. Amwa Devi 12. Janki Devi 13. Dharni Devi All are daughters of Late Khusro Singh All are residents of Village- Telodih, P.O. Handadih, P.S. Giridih(M), District- Giridih … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate Mr. Sanket Kumar, Advocate For O.P. Nos. 1 to 4 : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Advocate Mr. Parwez Ahmad Khan, Advocate ----- 04/05.05.2025 Heard Mr. A.K. Sahani along with Mr. Sanket Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma along with Mr. Parwez Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 1 to 4. 2. Surviving defect is ignored. 3. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for opposite party nos. 1 to 4 submits that Execution Case No.01/2019 has already been disposed of by the learned Court and possession has been delivered in favour 2025:JHHC:13453 -2- C.M.P. No. 166 of 2023 of opposite party nos. 1 to 4. He further submits that the challenge has been made in this petition of objection made in the said execution case, which has been rejected by the learned Court by the order dated 05.01.2023. 4. In view of the above submission, this petition has become infructuous and, as such, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/