Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Karnataka · body
2025 DAILYLAW 61909 (KAR)
SRI PUTTAIAH J S/O LATE JAVARAIAH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/102413/2025 · 2025-07-11
Pradeep Singh Yerur
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61909 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61909 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 102413 OF 2025 (S-TR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. PUTTAIAH J. S/O. LATE JAVARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, TECHNICAL ASSISTANT AND EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (ADDITIONAL CHARGE), OFFICE OF THE KARNATAKA URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD, DIVISION OLD PWD OFFICE, BAGALKOT-587101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD, JALA BHAVAN, BANNERGHATTA, BENGALURU-560083. 3. SRI. GURURAJ M. BANGINAVAR S/O. MALLAPPA BANGINAWAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, TECHNICAL ASSISTANT AND EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (ADDITIONAL CHARGE), KARNATAKA URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD, DHARWAD-580001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. DAYANAND BANDI, ADVCOATE FOR R2;
SRI. SANTOSH B. MANE, ADVCOATE FOR R3)
Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE AN ORDER OR DIRECTION OR WRIT IN NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRANSFERRING THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN PLACE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 05/04/2025 IN NO.KAJAMA/H.R.D.1/031/2025-26 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)
1. This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the order dated 05.04.2025 of respondent No.2 transferring 3rd respondent to the post of the petitioner vide annexure-F.
2. The petitioner is working in the cadre of Technical Assistant along with additional charge of Executive Engineer in the respondent No.2-Board. Respondent No.2 passed an order dated 15.07.2024 transferring the petitioner from Dharwad to Bagalakote as Technical Assistant along with additional charge of Executive Engineer of the Karnataka Water Supply and Drainage Board, Bagalakote. Thereafter, the petitioner
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
reported to the Office at Bagalakote on 24.07.2024 complying with the order.
It is the grievance of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent has been transferred to the place of the petitioner with an oblique motive and mala fide intention, which is illegal and arbitrary and the same cannot be sustained, as it is a premature transfer. Consequently, the transfer of the petitioner to Shivamogga is also illegal and would not be sustainable. 3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the transfer so made by the respondent is premature, as the petitioner came to be transferred on 15.07.2024 before completion of his period as prescribed under the transfer policy of the State Government i.e., two years, wherein he was disturbed from the present place of posting. It is contended further by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, this premature transfer is made solely to suit the needs of the 3rd respondent to replace the petitioner in his place of posting, which is not permissible even under the transfer guidelines and so also by several
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
judgments of this Court and the Apex Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in support of his case in Writ Petition No.20913/20241
disposed of on
30.08.2024. Hence, he is before this Court seeking to quash the impugned order passed by respondent No.2.
4.
Learned counsel for respondent No.3 has filed a detailed statement of objections contending that the writ petition is misconceived and is liable to be rejected on the ground that the transfer of 3rd respondent to the place of the petitioner has been made by the Government in accordance to the subsisting relevant provisions and in consonance to the Rules and the transfer is made by taking approval of the Hon’ble Chief Minister, which is permitted under the transfer guidelines.
5.
Learned counsel for the 3rd respondent further contends that the transfer of a person from one place to
1 Sri. Suhel Tanveer H.A. –and- The State of Karnataka and others
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
the other, if made, by the approval of the Hon’ble Chief Minister is permissible and this fact has not been brought to the notice of this Court by the petitioner in this petition regarding the approval of the Hon’ble Chief Minister in transfer of respondent No.3 to the post of the petitioner. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that, the transfer policy is within the domain of the respondents and in exigency of service, an officer can be transferred from one particular posting to another as the same would be in the public interest in accordance to the transfer guidelines. It is also contended by the
learned counsel for respondent No.3 that, premature transfer are permissible, if, the approval of the Hon’ble Chief Minister is taken and in the present case, same is taken, which is produced by virtue of a memo and it cannot be questioned, as approval is obtained in accordance with the rules. It is further contended by the
learned counsel for respondent No.3 that in pursuance of the impugned order, the petitioner has assumed charge
- 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
and has been conducting his regular work and daily transaction in the new place of posting. It is also contended that the transfer of the petitioner from Dharwad to Bagalkot is due to the complaints from local authorities, who had expressed dissatisfaction of working of the petitioner and considering this aspect, the Hon’ble Chief Minister has accorded approval for transfer of the petitioner so also the transfer of the respondent.
6. Learned AGA representing the State sustains the impugned order and has filed a memo furnishing the recommendation so made by the Hon’ble Chief Minister.
7.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and the counsel appearing for respondent No.3 sustain the impugned order and seek for dismissal of the petition. 8. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent and the 3rd
- 7 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
respondent, it is relevant to see the guidelines of transfer dated 22.11.2001 which has superseded the earlier guidelines dated
07.06.2013. In an identical circumstances, a Co-ordinate bench of this Court has dealt with this issue in the case of Shri. Kanteppa and The State of Karnataka and others2, wherein at paragraph 10 it has held as under:
“10. The guidelines of transfer dated 22.11.2001 which was superseded by the guidelines of transfer dated 7.6.2013, which regulated and presently regulate the transfer of Government servants in the State of Karnataka, have been declared to have a statutory force by two Full Bench judgments of this Court in the case of H.N. CHANDRU Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS reported in 2011 (3) KLJ 562 and in the case S.N.
GANGADHARAIAH Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA reported in ILR 2015 KAR 1955. Thus, the compliance of the guidelines becomes mandatory. The petitioner assumed charge of the post of Junior Engineer, PWD Sub-division, Jewargi, on 3.10.2018. The minimum tenure prescribed under the guidelines for a Group ‘C’ employee is four years. Clause 9 of the guidelines permits premature transfer of an employee only under certain circumstances i.e., the reasons to be recorded in writing and prior approval of the Hon’ble Chief Minister to be obtained. The recording of reasons is to be done by the competent authority which then has to be placed before the Hon’ble Chief Minister. It is only then a premature transfer will be in consonance with the guidelines. In the case on hand, there are no reasons recorded by the
2 ILR 2020 KAR 5511
- 8 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
competent authority in the order of transfer or prior approval of the Hon’ble Chief Minister obtained for effecting the impugned transfer. The impugned order is issued by the 2nd respondent-Chief Engineer. There is no indication of prior approval of the Hon’ble Chief Minister. Thus, the transfer order dated 20.9.2019 is contrary to the operative guidelines.
This view of ours, in this regard, is fortified by the judgment of the learned Division Bench of this Court, in the case of RAJASHEKAR M. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA reported in 2019 (1) AIR Kant R 489. The specific issue that fell for consideration before the Division Bench of this Court was as follows:
“1. Whether the Chief Minister has absolute discretion under Government Order No.DPAR 22 STR 2013, Bangalore, dated 07.06.2013 to give prior approval for premature/delayed transfers referred to in para 9 thereof ? This is the question that requires to be answered in this petition and it is answered in the negative. Under para 9(b) of the aforesaid Government
Order, the Chief Minister, on perusal of the reasons recorded by the Competent Authority, may give his prior approval for premature/delayed transfer of a Government servant, only if he is satisfied that the case would fall under any of the circumstances stated in para 9(a)(i) to (viii) of the Government Order.” The aforesaid issue has been answered at paragraph Nos.6 and 7, following the judgment of the Full Bench in the case of GANGADHARIAH S.N. (supra), which reads as follows:
“6. As could be seen from para 9 of the Government
Order extracted above, premature/delayed transfer of Government servants is permitted in the circumstances stated in para 9(a)(i) to (viii) with the prior approval of the
- 9 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
Chief Minister. It requires the competent authority to record reasons stating as to how the case would fall under any of the circumstances stated in para 9(a)(i) to (viii) of the Government Order to warrant premature / delayed transfer of a Government servant and the said reasons have to be placed before the Chief Minister to obtain his prior approval as mandated in para 9(b) of the Government Order. After perusal of the reasons, if the Chief Minister is satisfied that the case would fall under any of the circumstances stated in para 9(a)(i) to (viii) of the Government Order, only then the Chief Minister may give his prior approval for premature/delayed transfer of the Government servant. If prior approval is given by the Chief Minister for transfers not falling under any of the circumstances stated in para 9(a)(i) to (viii) of the Government Order, it will be invalid in law and any premature/delayed transfer made pursuant thereto will be illegal and hence is liable to be set aside. 7. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for State of Karnataka fairly submitted that prior approval of the Chief Minister was not preceded by recording of any reasons by the Competent Authority to show that the premature transfer of the petitioner and respondent No.4 would fall under any of the circumstances stated in para 9(a)(i) to (viii) of the Government Order. Hence, we find no error in the order of the Tribunal in setting aside the order of transfer as it was contrary to para 9 of the Government Order laying down guidelines for transfer of Government servants.” In terms of the law laid down by the learned Division Bench, a premature transfer will have to be in compliance of clause 9 of the guidelines which mandates recording the reasons by the competent authority and the Hon’ble Chief Minister approving the same. Both these acts should
- 10 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
mandatorily precede the order of transfer. Both these circumstances are not complied with by the State Government in the instant case.
Thus, the order dated 20.9.2019 was contrary to guidelines and the Tribunal ought to have interfered with the order of transfer.”
9. A Division Bench of this Court in the Writ Petition No.28046/20243 connected with Writ Petition No.27973/2024 disposed of on 11.06.2025, dealing with the similar issue has negatived the contention of the respondent No.3 therein. 10. Rules and guidelines at Annexure-R1 dated 07.06.2013 and then amended on 25.06.2024 reads as under:
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ £ÀqÀªÀ½UÀ¼ÀÄ «µÀAiÀÄ: ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÀ¼À §UÉÎ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼ÀÄ NzÀ¯ÁVzÉ: ¢£ÁAPÀ 07/06/2013gÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 22 ¸Éã˪À 2013 ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£É: DqÀ½vÀzÀ°è£À £ÀÆvÀ£À ¨É¼ÀªÀtÂUÉUÀ¼À »£É߯ÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀUÁðªÀuÁ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÁåªÀPÀªÁV ¥ÀÅ£ÀgÁªÀ¯ÉÆÃPÀ£À ªÀiÁr, ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ:07.06.2013gÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ DzÉñÀzÀ°è ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁzÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÁ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀjµÀÌj¹ ºÉƸÀzÁzÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÁ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
3 Sri. Naveen P.S. –and- The State of Karnataka and others. - 11 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåªÉAzÀÄ ªÀÄ£ÀUÁt¯ÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ F PÀ¼ÀPÀAqÀAvÉ DzÉò¹zÉ. ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: ¹D¸ÀÄE 33 ¸Éã˪À 2024, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ, ¢£ÁAPÀ:25.06.2024 ¥Àæ¸ÁÛªÀ£ÉAiÀÄ°è «ªÀj¹gÀĪÀ PÁgÀtUÀ½UÁV ªÉÄÃ¯É NzÀ¯ÁzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ:
07.06.2013gÀ DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß gÀzÀÄÝ¥Àr¹, ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤AiÀÄAwæ¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ F DzÉñÀzÀ°è ¸ÀÆa¹gÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÀjµÀÌøvÀ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸À®Ä ¸ÀPÁðgÀªÀÅ EaÒ¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ. F ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼ÀÄ 2024-25 £Éà ¸Á°¤AzÀ eÁjUÉ §gÀÄvÀÛªÉ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ GzÉÝñÀPÁÌV FUÁUÀ¯Éà ºÉÆgÀr¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¥ÀævÉåÃPÀ C¢ü¤AiÀĪÀÄ / ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ C£ÀéAiÀĪÁUÀĪÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀjUÉ F ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼ÀÄ C£ÀéAiÀĪÁUÀĪÀÅ¢®è
2. «ªÀgÀuÉ:- F DzÉñÀzÀ°è ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðªÀÅ C£ÀåxÁ CUÀvÀå¥Àr¸ÀzÀ ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ.- (1)
"¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ" JAzÀgÉ £ÉêÀÄPÁw ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ CxÀªÁ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ/ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£À ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä C¢üPÁgÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, (2) "ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ" JAzÀgÉ M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÀ£ÀÄß MAzÀÄ ºÀÄzÉݬÄAzÀ ªÀÄvÉÆÛAzÀÄ ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ PÀvÀðªÀåUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð»¸À®Ä MAzÀÄ PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÁÜ£À¢AzÀ ªÀÄvÉÆÛAzÀÄ PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÁÜ£ÀPÉÌ CxÀªÁ MAzÀÄ E¯ÁSÉ/PÉëÃvÀæ E¯ÁSÉ/DAiÀÄÄPÁÛ®AiÀÄ/¤zÉÃð±À£Á®AiÀÄ, EvÀgÉ PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ EgÀĪÀ PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÁÜ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß §zÀ¯Á¬Ä¹ ¨ÉÃgÉÆAzÀÄ PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÁÜ£ÀPÉÌ PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß §zÀ¯Á¬Ä¹zÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸ÀܼÀ ¤AiÀÄÄQÛ. (3) "ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£À" JAzÀgÉ £ÀUÀgÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄ°è §gÀĪÀ MAzÉà PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°ègÀĪÀ MAzÀÄ PÀbÉÃj¬ÄAzÀ E£ÉÆßAzÀÄ PÀbÉÃjUÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸ÀܼÀ¤AiÀÄÄQÛ. EzÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀPÁðgÀ ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄ ¸ÉêÉUÉ ¸ÉÃjzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ MAzÀÄ E¯ÁSɬÄAzÀ ªÀÄvÉÆÛAzÀÄ E¯ÁSÉUÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ¸ÀܼÀ¤AiÀÄÄQÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀºÀ M¼ÀUÉÆArgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. «ªÀgÀuÉ: ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀUÁðªÀuÉAiÉÄAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è. F ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ ªÀiÁUÀð¸ÀÆaUÀ¼ÀÄ ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ½UÉ C£Àé¬Ä¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è. (4) 'UÀÄA¥ÀÅ J', '©', '¹’, ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 'r' ªÀÈAzÀzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÀÄ JAzÀgÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ £ÁUÀjPÀ ¸ÉêÁ (ªÀVÃðPÀgÀt, ¤AiÀÄAvÀæt ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ªÉÄîä£À«) ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ, 1957gÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄ 5gÀr ªÀVÃðPÀj¸À¯ÁVgÀĪÀ UÀÄA¥ÀÄ-J, ©, ¹ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ r ªÀÈAzÀzÀ ¸ÀPÁðj ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÀÄ,
- 12 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
(5) 'eÉõÀ×vÁ WÀlPÀ' JAzÀgÉ MAzÀÄ ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ PÀæªÀĪÁV C¢üPÁgÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ £ÉêÀÄPÁw ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀzÀ ªÁå¦Û;
3. ªÀUÁðªÀuÁ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄ:
ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ/ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ F DzÉñÀzÀ°è £ÀªÀÄÆ¢¹gÀĪÀ µÀgÀvÀÄÛUÀ½UÉÆ¼À¥ÀlÄÖ ªÀÄÄRåªÁV ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ »vÀzÀȶÖAiÀÄ°è ¥ÁgÀzÀ±ÀðPÀªÁV ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ.
4. ªÀUÁðªÀuÉAiÀÄ §UÉÎ ¤§AðzsÀUÀ¼ÀÄ/ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ºÁUÀÆ £ËPÀgÀ£À dªÁ¨ÁÝjUÀ¼ÀÄ:- (1) ¥Àæ¸ÀPÀÛ 2024-25£Éà ¸Á°£À°è UÀÆæ¥ï-J, UÀÆæ¥ï ©. UÀÆæ¥ï-¹ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ UÀÆæ¥ï r ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ ªÀiÁqÀ¯ÁUÀĪÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ/ ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£ÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀASÉåAiÀÄÄ MAzÀÄ eÉõÀ×vÁ WÀlPÀzÀ°è PÁAiÀÄð¤gÀvÀ ªÀÈAzÀ §®zÀ ±ÉÃ. 6£ÀÄß «ÄÃgÀzÀAvÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ: 25.06.2024 jAzÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ:
09.07.2024gÀªÀgÉUÉ ¸ÁªÀðwæPÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ PÉÊUÉÆ¼Àî®Ä DAiÀiÁ E¯ÁSÁ ¸ÀaªÀjUÉ C¢üPÁgÀ ¥ÀævÁåAiÉÆÃf¸À¯ÁVzÉ. (2) DzÀgÉ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ/ ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ªÀiÁqÀĪÁUÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ PÀqÁØAiÀÄ ¤jÃPÀëuÉAiÀİè G½AiÀÄĪÀAvÀºÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼ÀÄ GAmÁUÀzÀAvÉ £ÉÆÃrPÉÆ¼ÀîvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. (3) AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ UÀA©üÃgÀ DgÉÆÃ¥ÀUÀ½zÀÝ°è ºÁUÀÆ DvÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ / Qæ«Ä£À¯ï £ÀqÀªÀ½ ¥ÁægÀA©ü¸À¯ÁVzÀݰè CxÀªÁ ¨ÁQ¬ÄzÀݰè CxÀªÁ DvÀ£À£ÀÄß C©üAiÉÆÃd£ÉUÉÆ½¸À®Ä GzÉÝò¸À¯ÁVzÀݰè CAvÀºÀªÀjUÉ ¸ÀÆPÀëä ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ / PÁAiÀÄðPÁj ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ £ÉëĸÀzÉà CªÀgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä «gÀÄzÀÞ ¨ÁQ¬ÄgÀĪÀ vÀ¤SÉAiÀÄ°è ºÀ¸ÀÛPÉëÃ¥À ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«®è¢gÀĪÀAvÀºÀ PÁAiÀÄðPÁjAiÉÄÃvÀgÀ (non-executive) ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ £ÉëĸÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ, ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ, E¯ÁSÁ «ZÁgÀuÉ/ Qæ«Ä£À¯ï ªÉÆPÀzÀݪÉÄ ¨ÁQ¬ÄgÀĪÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß CªÀ£ÀÄ PÉÆÃgÀĪÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ ¸ÀܼÀ¤AiÀÄÄQÛUÉÆ½¸À¨ÁgÀzÀÄ. (4) ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÉÆAqÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ DzÉñÀzÀ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ CªÀjUÉ ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸À¯ÁzÀ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°è PÀvÀðªÀåPÉÌ ºÁdgÁUÀzÉ, ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤Ãr gÀeÉ CfðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸À°è¸ÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è, ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÉÆAqÀ CAvÀºÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ, ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ DzÉñÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀr¸ÀĪÀ ¥ÀǪÀðzÀ°è CxÀªÁ ¸ÉÃgÀÄ«PÉ PÁ®zÀ°è D¸ÀàvÉæAiÀİè M¼ÀgÉÆÃVAiÀiÁV (as inpatient) aQvÉìAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ
- 13 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ªÀiÁvÀæ CUÀvÀå zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ ºÁUÀÆ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀ½AiÀÄ zÀÈrÃPÀgÀt ¥ÀvÀæzÉÆA¢UÉ gÀeÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉÆÃj CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹zÀ°è, ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É gÀeÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ ¥Àj²Ã°¹ gÀeÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ §UÉÎ ¤tð¬Ä¸À§ºÀÄzÁVzÉ. (5) M¼ÀgÉÆÃVAiÀiÁVzÀݪÀgÀÄ D¸ÀàvÉæ¬ÄAzÀ ©qÀÄUÀqÉAiÀiÁV, vÀzÀ£ÀAvÀgÀ ºÉÆgÀgÉÆÃVAiÀiÁV aQvÉì ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛzÀÝgÉ CxÀªÁ ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ¸À®ºÉ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ aQvÉì/«±ÁæAw ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄÄwÛzÀÝgÉ, CªÀgÀÄ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÉÆAqÀ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°è ¸ÉÃjPÉ PÁ®zÉÆ¼ÀUÉ PÀvÀðªÀåPÉÌ ºÁdgÁV, gÀeÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌ ¸À°è¹, gÀeÉ ªÀÄAdÆgÀÄ ªÀiÁrzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀªÉà gÀeÉ ªÉÄÃ¯É vÉgÀ¼À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. E®è¢zÀÝ°è ¸ÉÃjPÉ PÁ® «ÄÃjzÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ UÉÊgÀÄ ºÁdj JAzÀÄ ¥ÀjUÀt¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ (6) ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ M¼ÀgÉÆÃVAiÀiÁV aQvÉì ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃ¯É gÀeÁ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀqÁØAiÀĪÁV ¤UÀ¢vÀ ¸ÉÃjPÉ PÁ®zÉÆ¼ÀUÉ (Within the joining time prescribed) ¸ÀA§AzsÀ¥ÀlÖ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀPÉÌÀ, ¸À°è¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ E®è¢zÀÝ°è ¸ÉÃjPÉ PÁ® «ÄÃjzÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C£À¢üPÀÈvÀ UÉÊgÀĺÁdj JAzÀÄ ªÀjUÀt¸ÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ"
5.
F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÁªÀðwæPÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ°è ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÝ®è:- (1) M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß ¸ÉêɬÄAzÀ CªÀiÁ£ÀwÛ£À°èqÀĪÀ §zÀ®Ä ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸À®Ä/ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£ÀUÉÆ½¸À®Ä GzÉÝò¹zÁUÀ:
(2) ºÉƸÀ PÀbÉÃj / ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀÈf¹zÁUÀ CxÀªÁ ¤ªÀÄäwÛ, §rÛ, gÁfãÁªÉÄ »A§rÛ ªÀeÁUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ, ªÀÄgÀt¢AzÀ, PÀqÁØAiÀÄ ¤ªÀÈwÛAiÀÄ PÁgÀt¢AzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÀÄ vÉgÀªÁzÁUÀ CxÀªÁ £ÉÃgÀ £ÉêÀÄPÁw ºÉÆA¢zÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ªÉÆzÀ®Ä £ÉëĸÀĪÁUÀ CxÀªÁ §rÛ ºÉÆA¢zÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß £ÉëĸÀĪÁUÀ CxÀªÁ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà C¤jÃQëvÀ ¥Àj¹Üw¬ÄAzÀ GzÀãªÀªÁzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÀÄß vÀPÀët vÀÄA§¨ÉÃPÁzÁUÀ;
(3) «±ÉõÀªÁzÀ CxÀªÁ C¥ÀªÁzÁvÀäPÀ PÁgÀtUÀ¼À ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ ªÁ¶ðPÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÀ¼À ¸ÀASÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ¤µÀ× ªÀÄlÖPÉÌ ¹Ã«ÄvÀUÉÆ½¹ ¤¢ðµÀÖ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ªÀUÁðªÀuÉAiÀÄÄ CªÀ±ÀåªÉ¤¹zÀ°è EAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ZÁZÀÆ vÀ¥ÀàzÉà ¸À£Áä£Àå ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæUÀ½UÉ ¸À°è¹ CªÀgÀ C£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£É ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÀÌzÀÄÝ. - 14 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
(4) AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À «gÀÄzÀÞ ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ UÀA©üÃgÀ ¸ÀégÀÆ¥ÀzÀ zÀÆgÀÄ zÁR¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ªÉÄÃ¯ÉÆßÃlPÉÌ DgÉÆÃ¥À«zÉAiÉÄA§ §UÉÎ E¯ÁSÁ ªÀÄÄRå¸ÀÜgÀÄ C©ü¥ÁæAiÀÄ¥ÀnÖzÀݰè CAvÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ zÉÆÃµÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÉ ¥ÀnÖ/ZÁeïð ²Ãmï eÁjAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CxÀªÁ ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è C¢üPÁjAiÀÄ£ÀÄß C©üAiÉÆÃf¸ÀĪÀ §UÉÎ, C£ÀĪÀÄw ¤ÃrgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ RavÀªÁzÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtUÀ¼À°è. 6. MAzÀÄ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°ègÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ PÀ¤µÀ× CªÀ¢ü:- (1) MAzÀÄ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°è F PɼÀUÉ ¸ÀÆa¹gÀĪÀ ¸ÉêÁªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¸ÀzÀ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À£ÀÄß ¸ÁzsÁgÀtªÁV ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ/ ZÀ®£ÀªÀ®£À ªÀiÁqÀĪÀAw®è:-
PÀæ¸ÀA
ªÀÈAzÀ
¸ÉêÁªÀ¢ü (ªÀµÀðUÀ¼ÀÄ)
1. J®è UÀÄA¥ÀÅ-J ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÀÄ 2 ªÀµÀð
2. J®è UÀÄA¥ÀÅ-© ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÀÄ 2 ªÀµÀð
3. J®è UÀÄA¥ÀÅ-¹ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÀÄ 4 ªÀµÀð
4. J®è UÀÄA¥ÀÅ-r ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÀÄ 7 ªÀµÀð
vÀªÀÄä E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ ªÁå¦ÛAiÀÄr §gÀĪÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À MAzÀÄ ¤¢üðµÀÖªÁzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ PÁAiÀÄð ¸ÀégÀÆ¥ÀzÀ/¸ÀÆPÀëöävÉAiÀÄ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É MAzÀÄ ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ°è ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ ¸ÉÃªÉ ¸À°è¸À§ºÀÄzÁzÀ PÀ¤µÀ× CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÀaªÁ®AiÀÄzÀ DqÀ½vÀ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸À£Áä£Àå ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀĪÀgÀ ¥ÀƪÁð£ÀÄªÉÆÃzÀ£ÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ PÁ®PÁ®PÉÌ ¥ÀjµÀÌj¹/¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹ DzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀr¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ. (2) ºÉÊzÀgÁ¨Ázï PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ°è £É¯É¹gÀĪÀ PÀbÉÃjUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀܽAiÀÄ ªÀÈAzÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «ÄPÀÄ̽zÀ ªÀÈAzÀUÀ¼À°è£À ««zsÀ ªÀÈAzÀzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À°è SÁ° EgÀĪÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉzÀÄgÁV £ÉêÀÄPÁw ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀ £ÉêÀÄPÁw ¢£ÁAPÀ¢AzÀ PÀ¤µÀ× 10 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À ªÀgÉ«UÀÆ ºÉÊzÀgÁ¨Ázï PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀ ºÉÆgÀvÀÄ¥Àr¹ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÁgÀzÀÄ. - 15 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
7. CªÀ¢ü ¥ÀǪÀð /CªÀ¢ü «ÄÃjzÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÀ¼ÀÄ:- (1) F PɼÀPÀAqÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀPÀëªÀÄ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀªÀÅ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ MAzÀÄ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°ègÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ PÀ¤µÀ× ¸ÉêÁªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß «¸ÀÛj¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ CxÀªÁ PÀrvÀUÉÆ½¸À§ºÀÄzÀÄ.
(J)MAzÀÄ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°ègÀ§ºÀÄzÁzÀ UÀjµÀ× CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ½¹ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÉ CºÀð¤gÀĪÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ¤UÉ ¤ªÀÈvÀÛ£ÁUÀ®Ä JgÀqÀÄ ªÀµÀðQÌAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ ¸ÉêÁªÀ¢ü EzÀݰè;
(©)M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ «±ÉõÀ vÁAwæPÀ «zÁåºÀðvÉ CxÀªÁ C£ÀĨsÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢zÀÄÝ, CAvÀºÀ ¤¢ðµÀÖªÁzÀ ºÀÄzÉÝUÉ vÀPÀëtPÉÌ £ÉëĸÀ®Ä ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÁzÀ §zÀ° £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ ®¨sÀå«®è¢zÀݰè, (¹)PÉÃAzÀæ ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ AiÉÆÃd£É CxÀªÁ ¥sÁèöåUï²¥ï AiÉÆÃd£ÉUÀ¼À°è M§â ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ D AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ C£ÀĵÁ×£ÀUÉÆ½¸ÀÄ«PÉAiÀÄÄ ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR ºÀAvÀzÀ°ègÀĪÁUÀ DvÀ£À ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß »A¥ÀqÉzÀ°è ¸ÀPÁ®zÀ°è D AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀÇtðUÉÆ¼ÀÄî«PÉAiÀÄÄ UÀA©üÃgÀªÁV ¤®ÄèªÀ ¸ÀA¨sÀªÀ«zÀݰè, (r)¥Àw-¥ÀwßAiÀÄj§âgÀÆ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÁVzÀÄÝ, EªÀgÀ°è M§âgÀÄ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÉÆAqÀ°è, DUÀ E£ÉÆß§âgÀÄ ºÁ°¬ÄgÀĪÀ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°è PÀ¤µÀ× ¸ÉêÁªÀ¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÇgÉʸÀ¢zÀÝgÀÆ SÁ° ºÀÄzÉÝAiÀÄ ®¨sÀåvÉUÉÆ¼À¥ÀlÄÖ D ¸ÀܼÀPÉÌ, CxÀªÁ ºÀwÛgÀ«gÀĪÀ ¸ÀܼÀPÉÌ ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸À®Ä;
(E)MAzÀÄ ªÉÃ¼É ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀ ¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¥ÀzÁ¢üPÁjAiÀiÁVzÀݰè D ¥ÀzÁ¢üPÁgÀzÀ CªÀ¢ü ªÀÄÄVAiÀÄĪÀªÀgÉUÉ ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸À¨ÁgÀzÀÄ. (J¥sï) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ CxÀªÁ DvÀ£À / DPÉAiÀÄ CxÀªÁ ªÀÄPÀ̼ÀÄ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà UÀA©üÃgÀ CxÀªÁ ªÀiÁgÀPÀ PÁ¬Ä¯ÉUÀ½AzÀ §¼À®ÄwÛzÀݰè MAzÀÄ ¸ÀܼÀzÀ°è D ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ aQvÁì ¸Ë®¨sÀåªÀÅ ®¨sÀå«zÀÄÝ F §UÉÎ, ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀ½¬ÄAzÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæ ¥ÀqÉzÀ°è;
8. «±ÉõÀ ZÉÃvÀ£À £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀAvÉ PÉ®ªÀÅ «£Á¬ÄwUÀ¼ÀÄ: (1) «±ÉõÀ ZÉÃvÀ£À £ËPÀgÀjUÉ ¤AiÀÄvÀPÁ°PÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¥ÀÄ£ÀgÁªÀwðvÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÀ½AzÀ «£Á¬Äw ¤ÃqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ;
- 16 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
(2) «±ÉõÀ ZÉÃvÀ£ÀgÀÄ £ÉêÀÄPÁwUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ°è ¤ÃqÀĪÀ ¥ÁægÀA©üPÀ ¸ÀܼÀ ¤AiÀÄÄQÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß (Initial posting) ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀzÉÆÃ£ÀßwAiÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ°è CªÀgÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉ CªÀ±ÀåPÀªÉ¤¹zÀ°è ¸ÁzsÀåªÁzÀµÀÄÖ ºÀwÛgÀzÀ ¸ÀܼÀPÉÌ, ¸ÀܼÀ ¤AiÀÄÄQÛUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. (3) ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£À CªÀ®A©vÀ ªÀÄPÀ̼ÀÄ ¥Àw/¥Àwß, vÀAzÉ, vÁ¬Ä EªÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ wêÀævÀgÀªÁzÀ CAUÀªÉÊPÀ®åªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢zÀÝ°è ºÁUÀÆ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀ£ÀÄ CªÀgÀ ¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀÅ£Àgï ªÀ¸ÀwAiÀÄ dªÁ¨ÁÝj ºÉÆvÀÄÛ CAUÀ«PÀ®gÀ ºÀPÀÄÌUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀAgÀPÀëuÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ°è ºÉaÑ£À ¥ÁvÀæªÀ»¸ÀÄwÛzÀݰè CAvÀºÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ µÀgÀwÛUÉÆ¼À¥ÀlÄÖ, CAvÀºÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥Àj²Ã°¹, ¤AiÀÄvÀPÁ°PÀ ªÀUÁðªÀuÉUÀ½AzÀ «£Á¬Äw ¤ÃqÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CAvÀºÀ £ËPÀgÀgÀÄUÀ½UÉ ¸ÁzsÀåªÁzÀµÀÄÖ ºÀwÛgÀzÀ ¸ÀܼÀPÉÌ, ¸ÀܼÀ ¤AiÀÄÄQÛUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. (4) ¸ÉêÁ¤gÀvÀ ¸ÀPÁðj £ËPÀgÀgÀÄ vÀªÀÄä ¸ÉêÉAiÀÄ CªÀ¢üAiÀİè CAUÀ«PÀ®gÁzÀ°è, ªÉÊzÀåQÃAiÀÄ ªÀÄAqÀ½¬ÄAzÀ ¥ÀqÉzÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¸ÀĪÀ µÀgÀwÛUÉÆ¼ÀªÀ£ÀÄß CªÀgÀ£ÀÄß ºÀwÛgÀzÀ ¸ÀܼÀPÉÌ ªÀUÁð¬Ä¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ. PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdå¥Á®gÀ DzÉñÁ£ÀĸÁgÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CªÀgÀ ºÉ¸Àj£À°è
(«ÃgÀ¨sÀzÀæ) ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢üãÀ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð, ¹§âA¢ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ DqÀ½vÀ ¸ÀÄzsÁgÀuÉ E¯ÁSÉ
(¸ÉêÁ ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ-1) ¥Àæw:
1. ¥ÀæzsÁ£À ªÀĺÁ¯ÉÃR¥Á®gÀÄ (f&J¸ïJ¸ïJ)/(E&DgïJ¸ïJ)/(J&E), PÀ£ÁðlPÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ
2. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀĪÀgÀÄ. 3. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀĪÀgÀÄ. 4. ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀȶ GvÀà£Àß DAiÀÄÄPÀÛgÀÄ
5. ªÀiÁ£Àå ªÀÄÄRåªÀÄAwæAiÀĪÀgÀ C¥ÀgÀ ªÀÄÄRå PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀĪÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ðAiÀĪÀgÀÄ. 11. In view of the above discussion, I proceed to pass the following:
- 17 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8663 WP No. 102413 of 2025
ORDER i. This petition is allowed. ii. The impugned order dated 05.04.2025 bearing No.KAJAMA/H.R.D.1/031/2025-26 passed by respondent No.2 vide Annexure-F transferring petitioner to Shivamogga and the 3rd respondent to the place of the petitioner, is hereby quashed.
iii. The petitioner shall be put back to his original place of posting i.e., Bagalakote and shall be permitted to take charge at Bagalakote, forthwith.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
Kmv Ct:mck