IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 126 SANTOSH STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Mr. Vikrant Rana, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita mandamus directing representation dated 29.11.2024 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner ha Senior Superintendent grievances as mentioned considered and no action has this stage, the petitioner would to respondent No. decide the aforesaid representation filed by the p action thereon. 3. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: Versus STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Divya Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikrant Rana, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No. representation dated 29.11.2024 (Annexure P-2 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has titioner has recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police, U.T., Chandigarh ( mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued respondent No. 3- Senior Superintendent of Police, decide the aforesaid representation filed by the p Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.29212 of 2025 Date of decision: 26.05.2025 …. Petitioner STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikrant Rana, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya seeking issuance of a writ of No.2 and 3 to take action on their 2). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted recently filed a representation on 29.11.2024 before the U.T., Chandigarh (Annexure P2) raising her petition but the same has not yet been been taken thereon. He further submitted that at satisfied if appropriate directions are issued of Police, U.T., Chandigarh to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary Bharatiya seeking issuance of a writ of their submitted before the her petition but the same has not yet been further submitted that at satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to necessary Jyoti 2025.05.26 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM 4. Mr. Vikrant Rana, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent that the needful will be done in due co paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage w representation period of 15 days law. 26.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.29212 of 2025 Mr. Vikrant Rana, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. dated 29.11.2024 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No M No.29212 of 2025 -2- Mr. Vikrant Rana, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh, who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits urse. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed a direction to respondent No. 3 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-2) of the petitioner within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and submits urse. Let a complete set of the In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without disposed the aforesaid of the petitioner within a accordance with Jyoti 2025.05.26 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document