Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6190 (PNJ)

MANJIT SINGH @ MANGI SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/55013/2025 · 2026-02-12

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-55013- IN THE H (208) MANJIT SINGH STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. H MANISHA BATR 1. Throu Bharatiya Nagarik seeks anticipatory Section 15b of th Station Ellenabad, 2. Vide was released on in 3. Learn on instructions of investigation on 08 -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH  CRM Date INGH @ MANGI SINGH Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Vishal Sharda, Advocate for the p Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana ****  BATRA, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition filed agarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for patory bail in case FIR No.250 dated of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotro nabad, District Sirsa. Vide order dated 29.09.2025 passed on interim bail and was directed to jo Learned State counsel has filed statu ons of SI Satyam Singh submitted n on 08.12.2025 and he is not required JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-55013-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.02.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA  r the petitioner filed under Section 482 of the (for short ‘BNSS’), the petitioner dated 04.08.2025 registered under ychotropic Substances Act at Police passed by this Court, the petitioner d to join investigation. d status report dated 15.12.2025 and itted that the petitioner has joined quired for custodial interrogation. oner dent the ioner der olice ioner and ined AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.12 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-55013- 4. In vi investigation and g required. As such, case for release of petition is allowed petitioner is made Section 482(2) of 5. Since if any, is rendered 12.02.2026 Amit Sharma    -2025 (O&M) 2 In view of the fact that the petiti n and given the nature of allegations, h s such, without commenting on merits ease of petitioner on anticipatory bail llowed and the order dated 29.09.202 made absolute, subject to complianc (2) of BNSS. Since the main petition has been disp dered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes    petitioner has already joined the ions, his pre-trial incarceration is not merits of case, it is observed that a y bail is made out. Accordingly, the 2025 granting interim bail to the pliance of conditions laid down in en disposed of, pending application, (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No  the s not hat a , the o the n in tion, AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.12 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.