CWP-15009-2025 (O&M) 122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Chandandeep Singh State Election Commission CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr Mr. Kshitiz Goel, Advocate Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG Punjab. SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of Petition (Annexure P 2. At the outset, l petitioner would be satisfied, in case, decided by respondent No. 3. On learned State counsel submits that respondent No.2 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Chandandeep Singh versus Election Commission, Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Krishan Kanha, Advocate and Mr. Kshitiz Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG Punjab. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing respondent Petition (Annexure P-1), expeditiously. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner petitioner would be satisfied, in case, the Election Petition (Annexure P respondent No.2, expeditiously, which On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. the Election Petition (Annexure P respondent No.2, in accordance with law. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15009-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: May 23, 2025 ….Petitioner and others ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN and the petitioner. Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG Punjab. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ respondent No.2 to decide the Election earned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Election Petition (Annexure P-1) is which is pending till date. on advance service of copy of petition, issuance of notice of motion. She the Election Petition (Annexure P-1) will be decided by 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s Writ to decide the Election submits that is on advance service of copy of petition, She 1) will be decided by MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-15009-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the Election Petition (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 23, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment