Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61872 (PNJ)

RAVINDER KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/15041/2025 · 2025-05-23

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 121 Ravinder Kumar State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel states that a legal notice dated (Annexure P16 allow the petitioner for change of option for grant of revised pay scales w.e.f 01.11.2006 instead of earlier option w.e.f. 01.01.2006, which has been granted to the similarly situated person vide order dated 17.05.2021 (Annexure P15) however, the same prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 2. In view of the a case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated Court has no reason to believe the authori reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reas free to seek legal redress thereupon 23.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15041 Date of decision: 23.05.2025 Ravinder Kumar Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. SK Rattan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel states that a legal notice dated (Annexure P16) has been served for the claim as raised in the present case allow the petitioner for change of option for grant of revised pay scales w.e.f 01.11.2006 instead of earlier option w.e.f. 01.01.2006, which has been granted to the similarly situated person vide order dated 17.05.2021 (Annexure P15) however, the same has yet not evoked any response. prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. In view of the above and without commenting up this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 03.10.2024, within a period of 6 months Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reas o seek legal redress thereupon. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15041-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.05.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel states that a legal notice dated 03.10.2024 ) has been served for the claim as raised in the present case allow the petitioner for change of option for grant of revised pay scales w.e.f 01.11.2006 instead of earlier option w.e.f. 01.01.2006, which has been granted to the similarly situated person vide order dated 17.05.2021 (Annexure P15) has yet not evoked any response. He thus, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to the bove and without commenting upon the merits of the this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to within a period of 6 months, which this ties would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 03.10.2024 ) has been served for the claim as raised in the present case to allow the petitioner for change of option for grant of revised pay scales w.e.f 01.11.2006 instead of earlier option w.e.f. 01.01.2006, which has been granted to the similarly situated person vide order dated 17.05.2021 (Annexure P15), thus, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to the on the merits of the this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to , which this ties would not address in a just, fair and and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are ons and the petitioner shall be ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.23 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document