SIMARJEET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/5406/2025 · 2025-05-23
Manjari Nehru Kaul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61871 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61871 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 CRWP-5406-2025 Date of decision: May 23rd, 2025 Simarjeet Kaur and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present: Mr. A.S. Khosa, Advocate for the petitioners.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3, to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of private respondents No.4 and 5, who are stated to be family members of petitioner No.1.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners got married on 20.05.2025, against the wishes of family members of petitioner No.1, arrayed as respondents No.4 and 5. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) was also made to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sahib, for protection of their life and liberty, but in vain. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if directions are issued to PUNEET SACHDEVA respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sahib, to 2025.05.23 13:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRWP-5406-2025 -2- look into their representation (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.
4. On asking of the Court, Mr. H.S. Deol, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a directions to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sahib, to look into the representation dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) qua the alleged threat perception and take necessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law. May 23rd, 2025
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2025.05.23 13:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh