Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61860 (PNJ)

MANOJ KUMAR AND OTHERS v. AJIT BALA JOSHI

COCP/1877/2023 · 2025-08-20

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206-A Manoj Kumar and others Ajit Bala Joshi CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. that the order dated Bench of this Court in CWP State of Haryana and of compensation payable to the petitioner the learned Executing Court by the respondent(s). 2. passed in the present petition and the same stands accordingly. 3. 4. 20.08.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Manoj Kumar and others Versus Ajit Bala Joshi CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Mainee, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the the order dated 14.02.2022 (Annexure P Bench of this Court in CWP-20384-2021 titled as ‘ State of Haryana and others’, stands duly complied with of compensation payable to the petitioners the learned Executing Court by the respondent(s). In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same stands accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1877-2023 Date of Decision: 20.08.2025 .… Petitioners .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for the respondent. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits 14.02.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by a Division 2021 titled as ‘Pradeep Kumar vs. , stands duly complied with and the amount has also been deposited before the learned Executing Court by the respondent(s). In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same stands disposed of, Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No submits ) passed by a Division vs. and the amount has also been deposited before In view of the above, no further orders are required to be , RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.20 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.