IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1557 of 2025 ------ 1. Murari Mahra, aged about 49 years, son of Paltan Mahra 2. Kamal Mahra, aged about 50 years, son of Baleshwar Mahra 3. Ramu Mahra, aged about 60 years, son of Baleshwar Mahra 4. Bhirguram Mahra, aged about 48 years, son of Laxman Mahra 5. Mahtu Mahra, aged about 25 years, son of Guhi Mahra All residents of Village –Sirsa, P.O. and P.S. –Pathrol, District –Deoghar, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 07.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pathrol P.S. Case No.129 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 117(2), 118, 109, 351 (2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being the members of an unlawful assembly, in prosecution of common object of the assembly attempted to murder the son of the informant namely Praveen Bhokta. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the injury sustained by the victim is on hand and leg which are not the vital parts of the body. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Madhupur, in connection with Pathrol P.S. Case No.129 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-