Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61817 (PAT)

Chunnu Sharma @ Channu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./51179/2025 · 2025-08-28

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51179 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2024 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== Chunnu Sharma @ Channu Kumar S/O Ramanand Thakur Village- Badi Dih, P.S.- Sangrampur, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Amarjit Thakur S/O NA R/O Vill.- Mishrauliya, P.S.- Govindganj, Dist.- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma- A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 28-08-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the same has been specifically pleaded at Para-3 of the anticipatory bail application. It is further submitted that order impugned inadvertently records that petitioner has criminal antecedent. 3. In view of the submission made by the petitioner, the defect as pointed out by the office is ignored. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that petitioner has been given notice under Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C. and the police presently has not filed any Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51179 of 2025(2) dt.28-08-2025 2/2 application before the learned Magistrate seeking permission to arrest the petitioner, as such, the petitioner, for the present, does not have any apprehension of arrest and thus, seeks permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application with liberty to the petitioner to file afresh, if need arises. 5. Permission is accorded. 6. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T