IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 119 CWP-31513-2025 Date of Decision: 23.03.2026 RULDU RAM AND OTHERS ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. J.S. Mahal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Kanav Singla, Addl. A.G. Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondent to cancel grain depot of Respondent No. 6. They are further seeking direction to decide their representation dated 17.04.2025. 2. On 27.10.2025, the following order was passed by this Court: “Counsel for the petitioners has referred to the allegations of embezzlement of food-grains by respondent No.6. He states that despite representations, Annexures P- 1 & P-3, official respondents have not taken any action. He states that advance copy of the petition has been served upon official respondents. On asking of Court, Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab puts in appearance on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 5 and requests for deferment to get instructions. List on 27.11.2025.” DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.23 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-31513-2025 -2- 3. Learned State counsel submits that the jurisdictional authority would consider petitioners’ representation and take remedial steps in accordance with law. 4. In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the petition stand disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits. 5. This Court is sanguine that the jurisdictional authority would look into the matter expeditiously. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 23, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.23 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document