RAMAPPA GURUSIDDAPPA ARAMANI v. THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC
WP/100741/2025 · 2025-09-18
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61808 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61808 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12617 WP No. 100741 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 100741 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
RAMAPPA GURUSIDDAPPA ARAMANI AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED SERVICE, PLOT NO.1, MANJUNATHNAGAR, KANAVI PLOT, GADAG BETAGERI, GADAG, TQ. GADAG. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SAROJA C.BANAKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC REPTD BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER GADAG DIVISION, GADAG. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRASHANT HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, WRIT OF MANDAMUS OF POSITIVE NATURE, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO PAY THE INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 18% PER ANNUM ON THE BELATED PAYMENT OF TERMINAL BENEFIT I.E., LEAVE ENCASHMENT BENEFIT BY FIXING OUTER LIMIT AND ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER AS THIS HON’BLE COURT
Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12617 WP No. 100741 of 2025
MAY DEEM FIT IN CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING THE COST OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The matter was referred to mediation under the aegis of the Mediation centre in the light of the Mediation
“For the Nation” 90 days’ drive. Mr. B.D. Hiremath was appointed as the Mediator in the present case. 2. It is submitted that the Mediator has successfully facilitated a settlement between the parties. Pursuant thereto, a joint memorandum has been filed, recording the terms of the compromise, which reads as under:
“1. The Petitioner has filed the above writ petition seeking a direction to the Respondents to pay interest at 14% per annum on the belated payment of terminal benefits, namely leave encashment benefits. 2.
During the pendency of the above writ petition, the parties have amicably settled the issue involved, on the following terms and conditions, in order to put an end to the litigation:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12617 WP No. 100741 of 2025
a. The Management, though disputing the order, has agreed to pay interest at 7% per annum on the belated payment of leave encashment benefits for the period of delay, within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the award, which the Petitioner has accepted. b. It is further agreed that in the event of failure to pay the said interest within 8 weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order, the Respondent- Corporation shall pay interest at 9% per annum on the belated payment. c. If the Management fails to comply with the aforesaid conditions, the Petitioner is at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the competent Court of law for execution of this settlement. d. The above settlement and the terms agreed upon are in accordance with law, do not offend any provision of law, and constitute a fair and reasonable settlement in the interest of both parties. WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the matter in terms of the settlement recorded herein, in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. Accepting the joint memorandum, the petition is disposed of in accordance with the settlement reached between the parties. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12617 WP No. 100741 of 2025
4. This Court records its appreciation for the efforts of the learned Mediator Mr. B.D. Hiremath in amicably resolving the dispute. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
VB CT: UMD List No.: 4 Sl No.: 27