ANITENDRA NATH MITTER v. INSPECTOR GENERAL REGISTRTION
SA/1293/1972 · 2025-11-27
Sugato Majumdar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61801 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61801 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
11.11.2025 Ct. No.42
Sl. No.19 Mujahid
SA/1293/1972
ANITENDRA NATH MITTER VS INSPECTOR GENERAL REGISTRTION
1. This is a Second Appeal of 1972 which was listed before this court on 27.10.2025. Thereafter, the mater was adjourned on 11.11.2025. On that day there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. However, in the interest of justice, last opportunity was granted for today. However, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant today also.
2. The appeal is of 1972. It seems that appellant has lost his interest in the appeal. It is a settled proposition that the appellant or his lawyer has a duty to appear before the court when the same is listed for hearing.
3. Non-appearance of the appellant or his counsel in court without “sufficient cause” cannot be excused. Such conduct indicates the casual and negligent approach. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed in default and file be consigned to record room.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)