Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61795 (MAD)

N.Venkatesan, v. Mr.Ganesh Kumar and another

CONT P/1889/2024 · 2025-08-29

M S Ramesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.1889 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH Cont.P.No.1889 of 2024 N.Venkatesan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Ganesh Kumar, B.E., Secretary-cum-General Manager, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai – 600 005. 2.T.Srinivasan, Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Dharmapuri Circle, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. .. Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the orders of this Court in W.P.No.35682 of 2005 dated 05.03.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajendran For Respondents : Mr.S.Silambanan Senior Counsel for Ms.S.Mekhala 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1889 of 2024 M.S.RAMESH, J. krk O R D E R The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, had produced a copy of the receipt of the payment of Rs.4,62,837/-, credited to the account of the petitioner herein and claimed to be full payment of the entire dues. In view of the payment made, the disobedience alleged, may not be termed to be willful in nature. 2.In case, the petitioner is of the view that the arrears had not been fully settled, liberty is granted to him to make a representation to the respondents, which shall be considered within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 3.With the above liberty, the Contempt Petition stands closed. 29.08.2025 krk Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Cont.P.No.1889 of 2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis