Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61794 (ALL)

AVINASH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/7215/2025 · 2025-07-06

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:105852 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7215 of 2025 Petitioner :- Avinash Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kaushlendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,M.N. Singh Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 Director, State Council of Education Research and Training U.P., Lucknow to issue an appointment letter to the petitioner and join him on the post of DIET Lecturer Chemistry Science in pursuance of the advertisement bearing No. 5/2013-14 dated 07.02.2014 issued by the respondent no. 3 Public Service Commission, Uttar Pradesh. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 Director, State Council of Education Research and Training U.P., Lucknow to consider and decide the application of the petitioner for issuance of an appointment letter to the petitioner and join him on the post of DIET Lecturer Chemistry Science in pursuance of the advertisement bearing No. 5/2013-14 dated 07.02.2014 issued by the respondent no. 3 Public Service Commission, Uttar Pradesh." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that his representation dated 17.12.2024 pending before respondent no. 2 may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Sri M.N. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Shri M.M.D. Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Kaushlendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2 as well as Shri M.N. Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 and 4 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is provided to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no. 2 within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no. 2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 SY (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad