THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SUMITRA DAS AND ORS
I.A.(Civil)/1052/2025 · 2025-08-31
Susmita Phukan Khaund
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6179 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6179 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010013052025
2025:GAU-AS:11771
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1052/2025 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-7, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS SUMITRA DAS AND ORS W/O. SRI ICHCHAMAN DAS, R/O. VILL.- NEW BAGBAHAR PT-V, P/O.
BAGBAHAR, P/S. DWARBOND, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM.
2:PINAK BHADRA S/O. SRI SUBODH BHADRA R/O. VILL.- SARASWATI BAGAN
P/O. LOWARBOND P/S. SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM.
3:SANJU SINGHA S/O. SRI SAMENDRA SINGHA R/O. VILL.- DWARBOND P/O. BORDUKAN P/S. DWARBOND DIST. CACHAR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K GOSWAMI, MR. R SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR A B DEY (R-1),
Page No.# 2/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER Date : 01-09-2025
Learned counsel Mr. S.K. Goswami is present for the applicant/appellant.
2. Learned counsel Mr. A.B. Dey is present on behalf of the claimant/respondent No. 1.
3. This application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with prayer for condonation of delay of 197 (One Hundred and Ninety Seven) days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and award dated 02.02.2024 passed by the learned Member, MACT, Cachar at Silchar in MAC Case No. 90/2021.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that there is no malafide on the part of the applicant. The delay was owing to obtaining certified copy and sending it to the Regional Office at Guwahati from Silchar.
5. As sufficient grounds have been shown, the delay of 197 (One Hundred and Ninety Seven) days is condoned after hearing the submissions of both sides.
6. Registry to register the connected appeal.
Page No.# 3/3
7. In terms of the above observation, this Interlocutory Application stands
disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant