Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 280 CR-3066-2022 Date of Decision.:25.03.2025 Parkash Doshi Pe**oner Vs. Charandev Singh Mann and Others Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. G.S. Aulakh, Advocate for the peoner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) In civil suit bearing No.CS-42-2016 tled as ‘Parkash Doshi Advocate v. Charandev Singh Mann and Others’, for recovery of the amount as compensaon/damages, evidence of the plainff (peoner herein) was closed by the trial Court vide impugned order dated 27.04.2022 (Annexure P- 2) a5er nocing that plainff had already availed more than 39 opportunies including last opportunies. Applicaon moved by peoner-plainff to recall the order was dismissed by the trial Court on 06.07.2022. Both these orders are assailed before this Court. Noce of moon was issued for 03.08.2022. However noce has not been served on the respondents due to non-filing of the process fee.
2. It is noced that because of the inteirm order passed by this Court on 03.08.2022, further proceedings are not taking place before trial Court.
3. There are as many as seven respondents and in case, ma=er is again adjourned for the service of respondents, it is likely to cause delay in disposal of the case.
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.03.26 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-3066-2022
4. Considering all the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer of the counsel for the peoner is accepted to grant one more opportunity so as to conclude the evidence to be produced at own responsibility.
5. The trial Court is directed to provide one opportunity to the peoner-plainff to conclude its evidence to be produced at own responsibility. For that purpose trial Court shall fix a date. However cost of ₹25,000/- is directed to be deposited by the peoner-plainff in District Legal Services Authority, Sri Muktsar Sahib. The deposit of the said cost shall be condion precedent for granng opportunity to the peoner to produce his evidence.
6. It is further made clear that in case, peoner fails to deposit the cost, prior to the date to be fixed by the trial Court concerned, the present peon shall be deemed to have been dismissed and in that eventuality trial Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.
Disposed of.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE March 25, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.03.26 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document