[2025:RJ-JP:20091] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1905/2025 Chittarmal S/o Shyolal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kantavo Ki Dhani, Hirnoda, Police Station Phulera, District Jaipur. (Currently In Sub-Jail, Sambharlake.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4929/2025 Vivek Saini S/o Shri Ramgopal Saini, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Gordhanpura, Thana Phulera District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambharlake) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4930/2025 Premprakash @ Prakash Meena S/o Shri Naharsingh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Railway Phatak No. 241, Meeno Ki Dhani, Bobas, Thana Jobner, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambharlake). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh with Mr. Mohal Lal and Mr. Ravi Kumar Yadav Mr. Neeraj Sharma with Mr. Manoj Awasthi For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP Mr. Hakam Ali for Mr. N.A. Naqvi, Sr. Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR [2025:RJ-JP:20091] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1905/2025] Order 13/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.15/2025 registered at Police Station-Phulera (Jaipur Rural), District-Jaipur (Rural) for the offences under Section 111(4) BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/25(6) and 25(8) of Arms Act. Since all these bail applications arise from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion only. Petitioner-Chittarmal is behind the bars since 28.01.2025, petitioner-Vivek Saini is behind the bars since 23.01.2025 and petitioner-Premprakash @ Prakash Meena is behind the bars since 28.01.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on [2025:RJ-JP:20091] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1905/2025] the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Chittarmal S/o Shyolal, Vivek Saini S/o Shri Ramgopal Saini and Premprakash @ Prakash Meena S/o Shri Naharsingh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/40-42