Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6177 (KAR)

SHRI.SURESH BASANAIK PARISHWAD v. SANJAY ARJUNRAO DHAMANEKAR

MFA/100307/2022 · 2025-02-13

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100307 OF 2022 (MV) BETWEEN: 1 . SHRI.SURESH BASANAIK PARISHWAD AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE CUM TRANSPORT BUSINESS (NOW NIL) R/O KALARKOPPA, AT/POST: HIREBAGEWADI TALUK AND DISTRICT. BELAGAVI …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GURUKUMAR.V.A, ADVOCATES) AND: 1 . SANJAY ARJUNRAO DHAMANEKAR AGE.MAJOR, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. NATHPAI CHOWK, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI-590003. 2 . MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NEAR RDP CROSS, TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI. ... RESPONDENTS * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015 passed in MVC No.1550/2013 on the file of The III Additional District Judge and IV Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Belagavi. 2 This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R Finally two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing to do so, appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 10.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No.100307 of 2022 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 13.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: nth C By: sdp