Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6175 (RAJ)

SATISH KUMAR MEENA S/O SHRI RAMJILAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1932/2025 · 2025-03-05

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9832] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 1932/2025 Satish Kumar Meena S/o Shri Ramjilal Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Nangal Jhamarwara, Police Station Bejupada District Dausa. Currently Residing At Plot No. 45, Vishal Nagar, Panditpura, Bandikui, Police Station Baswa, District Dausa. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Meena on behalf of Mr. Mahendra Shandilya For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Shivraj Yogi Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 05/03/2025 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.171/2023 registered with the Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur (South) for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar so also perused the material available on record. 4. The allegation as levelled against the petitioner is that he received the money in a dishonest manner from the complainant as a sale consideration for the property which does not belong to [2025:RJ-JP:9832] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1932/2025] him. 5. The Police after completion of the investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is in custody since 13.08.2024. 6. Taking into consideration the nature of allegation levelled against the present petitioner, so also the material fact that the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge- sheet in the matter and further, the fact that the petitioner is in custody for last seven months, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. This second bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA/39