Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61726 (KAR)

SMT PRATIBA G AGNIHOTRI v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

RP/100118/2024 · 2025-11-03

Geetha K B, S G Pandit

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14860-DB RP No. 100118 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. REVIEW PETITION NO. 100118 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. PRATIBA G. AGNIHOTRI AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: JUNIOR ASSISTANT (DISMISSED) R/O. RADHAKRISHNA NAGAR, OPP. KEC MAIN ROAD, III CROSS, NEAR HANUMAN TEMPLE, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI, DIST. DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION, CO. LTD. (KPTCL), CAUVERY BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560002. Digitally signed by BHARATHI H M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.11.05 10:41:48 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14860-DB RP No. 100118 of 2024 2. THE DIRECTOR (ADMN AND HR), KPTCL CAUVERY BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560002. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER (ELCI.) O AND M CIRCLE, HUBLI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY, COMPANY LTD., (HESCOM), HUBLI DIST. DHARWAD-580009. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELCI.) O AND M URBAN DIVISION, HUBLI ELECTRICITY, SUPPLY COMPANY LTD., (HESCOM) HUBLI, DIST DHARWAD-580009. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED: 17.10.2019 PASSED IN WRIT APPEAL NO.100258/2018 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14860-DB RP No. 100118 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) We have heard Sri.Girish S Hiremath, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This review petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to review the judgment dated 17.10.2019 in WA No.100258/2018. 3. The petitioner was before this Court in Writ Petition No.105472/2014 questioning the order dated 14.02.2014, whereunder the petitioner was discharged from service in exercise of power under the Karnataka Electricity Board Employees (Probation) Regulations for non-passing of prescribed Departmental Examination. The writ petition came to be dismissed, against which, the petitioner filed an appeal in WA No.100258/2018 and the said appeal was dismissed by judgment dated 17.10.2019. 4. The order under review indicates that the petitioner was required to pass prescribed Departmental - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14860-DB RP No. 100118 of 2024 Examination i.e., Kannada Language examination during the period of probation. As the petitioner failed to pass the said Kannada Language examination during the probation period, the respondents rightly discharged the petitioner from service. No error, much less a grave error, on the face of the record has been pointed out to review the judgment dated 17.10.2019 passed in WA No.100258/2018. Accordingly, the review petition stands rejected. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE SH/JTR CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 14