MOHAMMAD HASSAN AND ORS. v. TSERING PALDAN AND ANR. (TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT) (LADAKH CASE)
CCP(S)/37/2022 · 2025-07-08
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6172 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6172 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 59 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) No. 37/2022 In WP(C) No. 1233/2021 Mohammad Hassan and Ors. …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Shahbaz Sikandar, Advocate Vs. Tsering Paldan and Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T.M. Shamsi, DSGI with Mr. Faizan Ganie and Ms. Bisma Ali, Advocate CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R 08.07.2025 Mr. T. M. Shamsi, learned DSGI, has produced a communication dated 8th July 2025, issued by Assistant Regional Transport Officer, Leh, UT of Ladakh, addressed to him, in which it is mentioned that wage claims of petitioners have been examined and calculated based on the last drawn wages verified in the pay acquittance register and that the department assures that upon receipt of funds from Finance Department, the disbursement in favour of petitioner would be effected without any delay in compliance to the directions of this Court. Copy of the said communication is taken on record in the open Court. In view of above, the proceedings are dropped and contempt is closed. However, if the amount is not released, petitioners can seek revival of contempt.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 08.07.2025 Shabroz