Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61701 (KAR)

PRABHU S KUBASAD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WA/100449/2025 · 2025-08-13

S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10164-DB WA No. 100449 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL WRIT APPEAL NO.100449 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: PRABHU S. KUBASAD AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. GANESH COLONY, 5TH CROSS, NEKAR ONI, OLD HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H.M. DHARIGOND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALURU-560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, HUBBLI-DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, LUMINGATION ROAD, HUBBLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24-02-2025 PASSED BY LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO. 100184/2025 AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE APPELLANT HEREIN IN ENTIRETY, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10164-DB WA No. 100449 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) After hearing the matter for sometime, learned counsel fro the appellant submits that his grievance subsists till date insofar as inadequacy of compensation and that he may be permitted to challenge the endorsement dated 23.11.1999. In light of said submission, the appeal is disposed off as not calling for adjudication. While not interfering with the order passed in WP No.100184/2024, we are reserving liberty to the appellant, as is permissible under law, to challenge the endorsement dated 23.11.1999. All contentions are left open. Pending applications, if any, are disposed off as not surviving for consideration. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE JTR CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 10