Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.5658 of 2025 Bhaskara Sahu ..... Petitioner (s) Mr. Trilochan Nanda,
Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Anr. ….. Opposite Party(s) Ms. Gayatri Patra, ASC Mr. Santosh Kumar Nanda,
Advocate
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order No.
24.02.2026
02.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. The Petitioner has filed this CRLMC with a prayer to quash the order dated 31.10.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Sessions Judge, Gajapati, Paralakhemundi in connection with G.R Case No. 88 of 2022, arising out of Mohana P.S Case No. 164 of 2022.
3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has been embroiled in this case only because he is the father of the principal accused, Jagannath Sahu. He further submits that the informant has entangled the petitioner in the present criminal case because the petitioner is active in politics. The criminal case has been lodged against the petitioner by the Opposite Party No.2 Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 26-Feb-2026 17:51:33 Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2. to defame, demoralize and denigrate the petitioner. There is also not an iota of medical evidence to sustain the allegations made by the Opposite Party No.2.
4.
Learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 opposes the move.
5. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the Petitioner,
learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 and on going through the averments made in this petition, this Court directs the Petitioner to approach the Revisional Court by filing a revision application for redressal of his grievance.
6. Accordingly, the CRLMC is disposed of.
(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge
Gitanjali