Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61691 (PNJ)

MOHD ANAS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/32003/2024 · 2025-04-03

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-32003-2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 308 CRM-M-32003-2024 Date of Decision: 03.04.2025 MOHD ANAS ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT Present: Mr. Rishab Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rupinder Singh Jhand, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Rahul Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.2. ****** N. S. SHEKHAWAT , J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of an FIR No.0067 dated 15.04.2024 under Section 420 of IPC, registered at Police Station Cyber South, District Gurugram (Annexure P-1) alongwith all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/affidavit dated 01.06.2024 (Annexure P-2). VIPIN KUMAR 2025.04.04 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-32003-2024 -2- 2. Vide order dated 15.02.2025, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 01.06.2024 (Annexure P-2). 3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram and got their statements recorded. Report dated 03.03.2025 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioner. 6. Resultantly, FIR No.0067 dated 15.04.2024 under Section 420 of IPC, registered at Police Station Cyber South, VIPIN KUMAR 2025.04.04 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-32003-2024 -3- District Gurugram (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner. 03.04.2025 (N. S. SHEKHAWAT) vipin JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.04.04 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order