MAMTA MISHRA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WTAX/2444/2025 · 2025-05-27
Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61684 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61684 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:90885-DB Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 2444 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mamta Mishra Respondent :- State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 others Counsel for Petitioner :- Imran Ali, Murtuza Ali Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Manoj Kumar Kushwaha (S.C.) Hon'ble Arun Bhansali,Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved of the notice dated 09.05.2025 issued by the respondents, indicating violation of license conditions of the petitioner and petitioner has been required to deposit penalty as well.
2. The petition has been filed seeking to question the issuance of notice by giving out the response to the said notice before this Court.
3. This Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot be converted into an original authority to decide the show cause notice.
4. Response, if any, has to be filed before the Authority, which has issued the notice and it goes without saying that the Authority, after going through the response and providing opportunity to the petitioner, would pass order in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above observations, no case for interference, at this stage, is made out in this petition, the same is, therefore, dismissed. Order Date :- 28.5.2025 Mukesh Pal/AKShukla (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad