VITTHAL BABARAO KALYANPAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/4135/2025 · 2025-03-26
Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Y G Khobragade
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61677 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 61677 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
936 WP NO. 4135 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4135 OF 2025 VITTHAL BABARAO KALYANPAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS … Mr. Phatale Sagar S, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. P. J. Bharad, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 …
CORAM :
MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 26.03.2025 PER COURT : . Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner is challenging the common judgment and
order dated 07.03.2025, whereby the committee has refused to validate his ‘Mannervarlu’ scheduled tribe certificate.
3. Issue notice to respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Learned AGP waives service of notice for both respondents.
4. We have heard both sides finally. 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:9049-DB
936 WP NO. 4135 OF 2025
5. The impugned judgment disposes of similar claims of five individuals, including the petitioner. The other four individuals had preferred separate writ petitions, namely, writ petition No. 3794 of 2025 and other connected matters. By the order dated 20.03.2025, the impugned judgment and order has already been quashed and set aside to the extent of those four individuals.
6. For the selfsame reasons as we have recorded in that
order, the writ petition is allowed. The Impugned judgment and order is quashed and set aside to the extent of the petitioner. The committee shall issue certificate of validity to him, which shall be co- terminus with the review, if any, in the matter of decision of this Court in case of Mayuri D/o Shriram Kalyanapad.
(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/ 2/2