Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6167 (RAJ)

SHER SINGH S/O LATE SHRI MANOHAR SINGH v. SITARAM SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI TOTA RAM SHARMA

CW/2387/2024 · 2025-01-16

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2300] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2387/2024 Sher Singh S/o Late Shri Manohar Singh, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of House No. 3839, Naiyon Ki Gali, Kundigar Bhainruji Ka Rasta Chokari Ghatgate, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Sitaram Sharma S/o Late Shri Tota Ram Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of House No. 3044, Opposite Dudu House, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manak Chand Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 16/01/2025 1. On 10.12.2024 following order was passed. “None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner inspite of two pass overs. Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous, as the physical possession of the demised premises has been handed over. Put up on 19.12.2024.” 2. On 09.01.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner remains unrepresented inspite of two pass overs, similar position is today. 3. In view of the order passed on 10.12.2024, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. 4. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for recalling of the order, in case there is factual discrepancy in the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/10