Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61665 (CAL)

STATE & ORS v. LAKSHMI NARAYAN AGARWAL

RVW/2407/2007 · 2025-12-10

Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, Tapabrata Chakraborty

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

26.02.2026 Court No.11 Item Nos.01-08 KCP RVW 2408 of 2007 With IA No.: CAN 1 of 2007 (Old No.: CAN 9250 of 2007) The State of West Bengal & Others – Versus – Sri Rajendra Agarwalla & Others With CPAN 661 of 2007 Sumitra Devi Agarwalla & ors. – Versus – Sukumar Singha Ray in WPLRT 1115 of 2001 And RVW 2407 of 2007 With IA No.: CAN 1 of 2007 (Old No.: CAN 9254 of 2007) The State of West Bengal & Others – Versus – Lakshmi Narayan Agarwal With CPAN 660 of 2007 Sri Rajendra Agarwal & Others – Versus – Sukumar Singha Ray & Others in WPLRT 1420 of 2001 And RVW 2409 of 2007 With IA No.: CAN 1 of 2007 (Old No.: CAN 9255 of 2007) The State of West Bengal & Others – Versus – Sumitra Devi Agarwal With CPAN 659 of 2007 Sumitra Devi Agarwal – Versus – Sukumar Singha Ray & Others in WPLRT 1419 of 2001 2 Mr. Pradip Kumar Roy, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sumedha Mukhopadhyay Ms. Shruti Mitra Ms. Soumita Chakraborty … for the writ petitioners In the order dated 10th December, 2025 passed in the above matters, the following typographical errors have occurred: (a) In the 4th line of paragraph 2, the quantum of land has been incorporated as ‘4.5 acres’ in place and stead of ‘4.5 satak’; (b) In the 20th line of paragraph 2, the date has been incorporated as ‘17.10.1994’ in place and stead of ‘30.09.1994’; (c) In the 22nd line of paragraph 2, the quantum of land has been incorporated as ‘one cottah’ in place and stead of ‘nine cottah’; (d) In paragraph 15 at page 9, the cause title of the contempt application has been incorporated as ‘CPAN 661 of 200’ in place and stead of ‘CPAN 661 of 2007’; (e) In the 1st line of paragraph 15, the name of the applicants’ learned advocate has been incorporated as ‘Mr. De’ in place and stead of ‘Mr. Roy’. Office is directed to incorporate necessary corrections in the order dated 10th December, 2025. 3 The other portions of the said order shall remain unaltered. This rectification shall be deemed to have been incorporated in the order dated 10.12.2025. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)