IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 210 Neelam Rani State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. inaction of the petitioner for appoin the amount of dues regarding gratuity, leave encashment and other benefits. 2. was working as Class the first relief may be available, in accordance with law 3. 4. benefits, he submits that the said respondent and convey the same and in case to which learned couns 5. 02.04.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Neelam Rani Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Ravi Gakhar, Advocate and Mr. Devyansh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab Mr. Abhivadya Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.3. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for the respondents with regard to the application submitted by the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds, and for releasing the amount of dues regarding gratuity, leave encashment and other Learned counsel submits that the husband of the petitioner was working as Class-IV Employee with respondent No.3 and insofar as relief is concerned, seeks liberty to avail of alternate remedy, that may be available, in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. However, with regard to the benefits, he submits that the said respondent and convey the same and in case, any amount is to which learned counsel for respondent No.3 has Disposed of accordingly. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14414-2017 (O & M) Date of decision: 02.04.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY . Ravi Gakhar, Advocate and dvocate, for the petitioner. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Abhivadya Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the th regard to the application submitted by the tment on compassionate grounds, and for releasing the amount of dues regarding gratuity, leave encashment and other Learned counsel submits that the husband of the petitioner respondent No.3 and insofar as ty to avail of alternate remedy, that owever, with regard to the balance amount of the retiral benefits, he submits that the said respondent-School may take a decision amount is found due, it be released, respondent No.3 has no objection. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.03 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.