Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6165 (KER)

P.G. JOSEPH v. P.G. GEORGEKUTTY

RSA/30/2018 · 2025-04-10

M A Abdul Hakhim

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:KER:31329 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RSA NO. 30 OF 2018 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DATED 10.06.2015 IN AS NO.1 OF 2011 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 24.11.2010 IN OS NO.290 OF 2005 OF MUSNIFF COURT,ADOOR APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: P.G. JOSEPH S/O. GEEVARGHESE MUTHALALI, RESIDING AT THEKKEVEETTIL BUNGLOW,KANNAMKODU MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN SMT.TINA ALEX THOMAS RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 7: 1 P.G. GEORGEKUTTY S/O. GEEVARGHESE MUTHALALI, RESIDING AT THEKKEVEETTIL BUNGLOW, KANNAMKODU MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE, PIN-628345. 2 THRESYAMMA D/O. THANKAMMA, RESIDING AT MURIKKINAL VEEDU, KADAPRA MURI, NIRANAM VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PIN-689621. 2025:KER:31329 RSA NO.30 OF 2018 2 3 SUNNY RESIDING AT MANGATTETHU VEEDU, PONGALADI MURI,PANDALAM THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, PIN-691525. 4 SANDRA SUNNY D/O. SUNNY, MANGATTETHU VEEDU, PONGALADI MURI,PANDALAM THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN SUNNY, MANGATTETHU VEEDU, PONGALADI MURI,PANDALAM THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, PIN-691525. 5 GRACY KOSHY W/O. LATE KOSHY MUTHALALI, RESIDING AT PUTHENPARAMBIL VEEDU, KANNAMKODE MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE, PIN-628345. 6 SAJI P. KOSHY D/O. LATE KOSHY MUTHALALI,RESIDING AT PUTHENPARAMBIL VEEDU, KANNAMKODE MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE, PIN-628345. 7 SUNI P. KOSHY D/O. LATE KOSHY MUTHALALI,RESIDING AT PUTHENPARAMBIL VEEDU, KANNAMKODE MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE, PIN-628345. BY ADVS. FOR R1 & R4 SMT.ANNIE M.ABRAHAM SRI.T.K.BIJU MANJINIKARA SRI.BIJU C.VARUGHESE SMT.BINDU N.RAJAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:31329 RSA NO.30 OF 2018 3 JUDGMENT 1. In spite of the repeated orders from this Court to take steps against R7, it is seen that appellant has not taken steps. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE sms