326 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SANGAM DEV & ORS. STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Pardeep Panwar, Advocate Mr. Mr. Satyawan Singh Nain, HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No. 31.01.2025, registered under Sections at Police Station arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated (Annexure P-2). 2. The following order was passed on IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: SANGAM DEV & ORS. V/S HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Pardeep Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Satbir Gori Puriya DAG, Haryana Mr. Satyawan Singh Nain, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No. , registered under Sections 61(2), 62, 140(3) at Police Station Buria, District Yamuna Nagar and arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated ). The following order was passed on “Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the No.18 dated 31.01.2025, registered under Sections 140(3) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28490-2025 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR for the petitioners. Haryana. Advocate for respondent No.2. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR No.18 dated 61(2), 62, 140(3) of Indian Penal Code and all subsequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated 12.05.2025 The following order was passed on 23.05.2025 :- petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking quashing of the FIR , registered under Sections 62(2), 62, 140(3) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Buria, HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28490-2025 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between th parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and FIR No. 2025 2 District Yamuna Nagar and all su out of the same, on the basis compromise dated (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 Satyawan Singh Nain, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and filed power of attorney. Same is taken on record. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 admits the factum of compromise. Service is complete. Adjourned to 21.07.2025. In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of the compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed i.e. 21.07.2025. A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between th parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 FIR No.18 dated 31.01.2025, registered under Sections all subsequent proceedings arising on the basis compromise dated 12.05.2025 Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana, who is present in the behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Satyawan Singh Nain, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and filed power of attorney. Same is taken on record. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 admits the factum of 25. In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and ter recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of the compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition , registered under Sections 61(2), HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28490-2025 62, 140(3) of Indian Penal Code Nagar and all consequential qua the petitioner July 21, 2025 himanshu (i) (ii) 2025 3 Indian Penal Code at Police Station consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioners. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable at Police Station Buria, District Yamuna proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document