114 1. M/S VR MOHAN DEV PUBLIC SCHOOL NAGAR, MOHALI. PRESIDING OFFICER (IN THE RANK OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE) AND ANOTHER 2. M/S VR MOHAN DEV PUBLIC SCHOOL NAGAR, MOHALI. PRESIDING OFFICE DISTRICT JUDGE) AND ANOTHER CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 10 M/S VR MOHAN DEV PUBLIC SCHOOL NAGAR, MOHALI. VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER (IN THE RANK OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE) AND ANOTHER And M/S VR MOHAN DEV PUBLIC SCHOOL NAGAR, MOHALI. VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER (IN THE RANK OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE) AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Rajdeep Singh Cheema, for the petitioner(s). *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Present set of two writ petitions involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 10-07-2025 CWP-14958-2025 M/S VR MOHAN DEV PUBLIC SCHOOL, DERABASSI, DISTT. SAS ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER (IN THE RANK OF ADDITIONAL ........Respondent(s) CWP-15524-2025 M/S VR MOHAN DEV PUBLIC SCHOOL, DERABASSI, DISTT. SAS ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS R (IN THE RANK OF ADDITIONAL ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) resent set of two writ petitions involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by , DERABASSI, DISTT. SAS ........Petitioner(s) PRESIDING OFFICER (IN THE RANK OF ADDITIONAL ........Respondent(s) , DERABASSI, DISTT. SAS ........Petitioner(s) R (IN THE RANK OF ADDITIONAL ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI resent set of two writ petitions involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.10 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14958-2025 and CWP-15524-2025 -2- 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that inadvertently all the averments required to be made for pressing the present set of petitions could not be made by the counsel hence, the present set of petitions may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to file one on the same cause of action. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case. 10-07-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.10 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document