Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61635 (PNJ)

BALBINDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/15298/2025 · 2025-05-26

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 128 BALBINDER SINGH STATE OF CORAM: Present: VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. J the respond 3rd ACP which is due since 2006 and 2015 2. was already decided Division Bench of this Court in a batch of LPAs including of 2015 titled as ‘State of Haryana and others Vs. Parmanand and others’ being the lead case 3. aforesaid judgment. 4. terms of judgment dated 05.03.2025 passed in LPA No.1865 of 2015 titled as ‘State of Haryana and others Vs. Parmanan MAY 26, 202 Vishal sharma IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision BALBINDER SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Mr. Raman Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. J (ORAL) The instant writ petition has been filed dents to consider the case of the petitioner for grant which is due since 2006 and 2015-1 Counsel for the petitioner contends that similar controversy already decided vide judgment dated 05.03.2025 Division Bench of this Court in a batch of LPAs including of 2015 titled as ‘State of Haryana and others Vs. Parmanand and being the lead case. Learned State counsel is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid judgment. Accordingly, the present writ petition is judgment dated 05.03.2025 passed in LPA No.1865 of 2015 titled as ‘State of Haryana and others Vs. Parmanan 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15298-2025 ate of Decision: 26.05.2025. ...Petitioner …Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. been filed seeking directions to ents to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of 2nd and 16. contends that similar controversy vide judgment dated 05.03.2025 by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in a batch of LPAs including LPA No.1865 of 2015 titled as ‘State of Haryana and others Vs. Parmanand and Learned State counsel is not in a position to dispute the Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in judgment dated 05.03.2025 passed in LPA No.1865 of 2015 titled as ‘State of Haryana and others Vs. Parmanand and others’. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.05.28 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document