CWP-15241-20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 142 REENA GOYAL AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. Ranjan TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The quashing the judgment Rohtak, whereby the petitioner’s appeal seeking leave encashment compassionate financial assistance for the deceased/husband of petitioner no.1, who worked as Professor Education Society. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner any illegality or error of law in the impugned judgment shows it has been passed on relevant facts by taking into consideration the provisions of law. A reference can be made to the following findings by the Tribunal the 1974 Act entitle the teachers of the affiliated colleges to get the benefit of leave encashment, that Act or in the 1994 Act which obligates the State Government to extend the benefit of leave encashment to the university teachers or to the teachers of the affiliated colleges and the mere fact that the Statutes of the p 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Decided On: REENA GOYAL AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Ranjan Arora, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia judgment, dated 14.11.2024, passed by the Educational Tribunal , whereby the petitioner’s appeal seeking leave encashment compassionate financial assistance for the deceased/husband of petitioner 1, who worked as Professor in the respondent Education Society. Learned counsel for the petitioner any illegality or error of law in the impugned judgment shows it has been passed on relevant facts by taking into consideration the provisions of law. A reference can be made to the following findings by the Tribunal: Though the Statutes framed by the Pune University under the 1974 Act entitle the teachers of the affiliated colleges to get the benefit of leave encashment, that Act or in the 1994 Act which obligates the State Government to extend the benefit of leave encashment to the university teachers or to the teachers of the affiliated colleges and the mere fact that the Statutes of the particular university provide for grant IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15241-2025 Decided On: 26.05.2025 ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA for the petitioners. inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari , passed by the Educational Tribunal, , whereby the petitioner’s appeal seeking leave encashment and compassionate financial assistance for the deceased/husband of petitioner respondent/College run by Vaish Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to point out any illegality or error of law in the impugned judgment, a perusal whereof shows it has been passed on relevant facts by taking into consideration the provisions of law. A reference can be made to the following findings recorded Though the Statutes framed by the Pune University under the 1974 Act entitle the teachers of the affiliated colleges to get the benefit of leave encashment, there is no provision either in that Act or in the 1994 Act which obligates the State Government to extend the benefit of leave encashment to the university teachers or to the teachers of the affiliated colleges and the mere articular university provide for grant certiorari , and compassionate financial assistance for the deceased/husband of petitioner run by Vaish has not been able to point out perusal whereof shows it has been passed on relevant facts by taking into consideration the recorded Though the Statutes framed by the Pune University under the 1974 Act entitle the teachers of the affiliated colleges to get there is no provision either in that Act or in the 1994 Act which obligates the State Government to extend the benefit of leave encashment to the university teachers or to the teachers of the affiliated colleges and the mere articular university provide for grant Aman Dua 2025.05.29 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-15241-20 of leave encashment to the teachers, does not entitle the concerned university or college to claim reimbursement from the State Government as of right. 12. assistanc exists under which compassionate appointment can be provided to the dependent of the deceased employee of unaided school or college. Compassionate appointments are not a general entitlement but are con govern them. Therefore, without an established frame work supporting their claim, it is evident that the appellants are not eligible for compassionate appointment based on the circumstances outlined above. No dou intended to assist families facing financial hardships due to the loss of the primary earner, but eligibility is strictly defined and limited to certain conditions. 3. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the present petition and it stands dismissed 26.05.2025 Ad 2025 -2- of leave encashment to the teachers, does not entitle the concerned university or college to claim reimbursement from the State Government as of right. 12. Similarly, the appellants' claim for compassionate assistance is concerned, lack legal foundation, as no provision exists under which compassionate appointment can be provided to the dependent of the deceased employee of unaided school or college. Compassionate appointments are not a general entitlement but are contingent upon specific schemes or rules that govern them. Therefore, without an established frame work supporting their claim, it is evident that the appellants are not eligible for compassionate appointment based on the circumstances outlined above. No dou intended to assist families facing financial hardships due to the loss of the primary earner, but eligibility is strictly defined and limited to certain conditions. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the present petition and it stands dismissed in limine. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? of leave encashment to the teachers, does not entitle the concerned university or college to claim reimbursement from the Similarly, the appellants' claim for compassionate e is concerned, lack legal foundation, as no provision exists under which compassionate appointment can be provided to the dependent of the deceased employee of unaided school or college. Compassionate appointments are not a general tingent upon specific schemes or rules that govern them. Therefore, without an established frame work supporting their claim, it is evident that the appellants are not eligible for compassionate appointment based on the circumstances outlined above. No doubt, such appointments are intended to assist families facing financial hardships due to the loss of the primary earner, but eligibility is strictly defined and In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the present TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No of leave encashment to the teachers, does not entitle the concerned university or college to claim reimbursement from the Similarly, the appellants' claim for compassionate e is concerned, lack legal foundation, as no provision exists under which compassionate appointment can be provided to the dependent of the deceased employee of unaided school or college. Compassionate appointments are not a general tingent upon specific schemes or rules that govern them. Therefore, without an established frame work supporting their claim, it is evident that the appellants are not eligible for compassionate appointment based on the bt, such appointments are intended to assist families facing financial hardships due to the loss of the primary earner, but eligibility is strictly defined and In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the present Aman Dua 2025.05.29 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document