Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61624 (PNJ)

HARJINDER PAL SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/15038/2025 · 2025-05-23

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15038-2025 (O&M) 123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Harjinder Pal Singh State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate, Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondent SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of 10 marlas to the petitioner in Sector 12, Panipat or in any other adjoining sector being oustee 2. At petitioner would be satisfied, in case, 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Harjinder Pal Singh versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Vaneet Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate, Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondent ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to 10 marlas to the petitioner in Sector 12, Panipat or in any other adjoining sector being oustee. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied, in case, his pending 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15038-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: May 23, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondent – HSVP. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to allot a plot measuring 10 marlas to the petitioner in Sector 12, Panipat or in any other adjoining earned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending representation/ application 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s Writ allot a plot measuring 10 marlas to the petitioner in Sector 12, Panipat or in any other adjoining earned counsel for the petitioner submits that representation/ application MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-15038-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 dated 20.03.2025 (Annexure P-13) is considered and decided by respondent No.2, which has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned counsel for the respondents appear and oppose issuance of notice of motion. They submit that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.2 and it shall take decision either way, on the pending representation/ application dated 20.03.2025 (Annexure P-13) of the petitioner. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the pending representation/ application dated 20.03.2025 (Annexure P-13) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 23, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment