Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 61622 (PAT)

Ajay Kumar Bishwas v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./52357/2024 · 2025-01-18

Nawneet Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52357 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2024 Thana- PALASI District- Araria ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Bishwas S/o Dharmnath Bishwas R/o vill - Bokantari ward no. 5, P.s. - Sikty, Distt- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 114 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354(B), 354(C), 499, 500, 501, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 67, 67(A) of I.T. Act. 3. As per FIR, the petitioner prepared videographs of the informant on the basis thereof, he was pressurizing her to solemnize marriage. After making that video viral, he created hurdles in marriage of the victim. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52357 of 2024(3) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 He has submitted further that there was love and affection between the petitioner and the alleged victim. The victim, in her statement under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C., did not support the prosecution case. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the witnesses in paragraph nos. 5, 6, 7 and 10 of the case diary have stated that the petitioner made filthy videographs of the victim and make it viral in the village. 6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, I do not think it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. kundan/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T