IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 SUBHASH CHAND UNION BANK OF INDIA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Mr. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is Bank to handover physical possession o purchased by the petitioner in 29.10.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits tha of this petition that petitioner. The petitioner regard to the other possession had been delivered amount had been the articles belonging to the borrower/original and have not been removed by the Bank 3. Issue notice to the respondent/Bank. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14992-2025 DATE OF DECISION: SUBHASH CHAND Versus UNION BANK OF INDIA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Yashdeep Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. Yogesh Goel, Advocate (through Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate for the respondent ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is inter alia seeking a direction to the to handover physical possession of the secured asset which has been purchased by the petitioner in the auction conducted by the respondent/Bank on Learned counsel for the petitioner submits tha that the possession of the property has been handed over to the petitioner would seek recourse to the alternative remedy with other subsisting grievances, including been delivered to him after considerable delay had been deposited by the petitioner by 1 the articles belonging to the borrower/original owner are lying in the premises and have not been removed by the Bank. Issue notice to the respondent/Bank. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 23.05.2025 … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL DEEPAK MANCHANDA , Advocate for the petitioner. through VC) and respondent. seeking a direction to the respondent/ f the secured asset which has been conducted by the respondent/Bank on Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is only after filing rty has been handed over to the would seek recourse to the alternative remedy with including the claim for interest, as considerable delay as the entire by 14.11.2024. He also submits that owner are lying in the premises Issue notice to the respondent/Bank. / f the secured asset which has been conducted by the respondent/Bank on after filing rty has been handed over to the would seek recourse to the alternative remedy with as the entire He also submits that owner are lying in the premises SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.05.23 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14992-2025 4. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent/Bank 5. Heard. 6. The redressed as the petition stands disposed of with a direction to the articles, if any, which belong to the borrower/original owner. The needful be done within a period of one month from now. to seek recourse to the alternative remedy available to him under the law for redressal of his subsisting grievances. 23.05.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2025 Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent/Bank. Heard. The grievance of the petitioner appear the possession of the property has been handed over to petition stands disposed of with a direction to the articles, if any, which belong to the borrower/original owner. The needful be done within a period of one month from now. The se to the alternative remedy available to him under the law for his subsisting grievances. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) (DEEPAK MANCHANDA Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No -2- Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the of the petitioner appears to have been substantially has been handed over to him. The petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent/Bank to remove the articles, if any, which belong to the borrower/original owner. The needful be The petitioner would be at liberty se to the alternative remedy available to him under the law for (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the to have been substantially . The Bank to remove the articles, if any, which belong to the borrower/original owner. The needful be would be at liberty se to the alternative remedy available to him under the law for SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.05.23 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document